Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Oct 03, 2018
  2. Oct 02, 2018
    • Nicolas Martinelli's avatar
      [FIX] sale_crm: quotes count · 695050dd
      Nicolas Martinelli authored
      - Create a SO from an opportunity, keep the status draft
        => the 'Quote(s)' number is 1 on the opportunity
      - Confirm the SO
      
      The 'Quote(s)' number is 0 on the opportunity, but when clicking on the
      stat button 1 quote is displayed.
      
      The `search_default_draft` (and the `search_default_sales` of the Orders
      stat button) are not working since the action doesn't use the
      appropriate search view.
      
      opw-1888442
      695050dd
    • Goffin Simon's avatar
      [FIX] sale_mrp: Updating delivered qty · 73b4abfc
      Goffin Simon authored
      Steps to reproduce the bug:
      
      - Create three stockable products: Kit, C1 and C2
      - Create a phantom BOM for Kit with C1 and C2 as components
      - Set the invoicing policy of the kit based on delivered qty
      - Create an SO for the kit and validate it
      - On the delivery order, just deliver C1 and create a backorder for C2
      - Cancel the backorder and duplicate it
      - Deliver the duplicated backorder and validate it
      
      Bug:
      
      The delivered qty on the SO line has not been updated to 1.
      
      opw:1886315
      73b4abfc
  3. Oct 01, 2018
    • Goffin Simon's avatar
      [FIX] sale_mrp: price unit of kit · e764739d
      Goffin Simon authored
      - Create the following products in FIFO costing method and real-time
        valuation:
        Prod Final (F); Invoiced on Delivered Quantity
        Prod Comp1 (C1); Cost = 20
        Prod Comp2 (C2); Cost = 10
      - Create the BOM Kit for F:
        2 Unit(s) of C1
        1 Unit(s) of C2
      - Create a SO for 3 Unit(s) of F
      - Validate SO and picking
      - Create the invoice and validate
      
      The price unit taken into account for F in the anglo-saxon accounting
      entry is:
      20 + 10 = 30
      => entry in Stock Output Account is 3 * 30 = 90
      
      while it should be:
      (2 * 20) + (1 * 10) = 50
      => entry in Stock Output Account is 3 * 50 = 150
      
      This should finally fix issues corrected with:
      9a7ed7ca: price unit multiplied by the qty sold (*)
      f1fdb97e: price unit taking into account only 1 unit of each
      component
      
      (*) In the use case solved, the price unit was:
      (6 * 20) + (3 * 10) = 150
      => entry in Stock Output Account is 3 * 150 = 450
      
      opw:1886216
      e764739d
  4. Sep 30, 2018
  5. Sep 28, 2018
  6. Sep 26, 2018
  7. Sep 25, 2018
  8. Sep 24, 2018
  9. Sep 23, 2018
  10. Sep 21, 2018
  11. Sep 19, 2018
  12. Sep 18, 2018
  13. Sep 17, 2018
  14. Sep 16, 2018
    • Jérome Maes's avatar
      [FIX] portal: avoid strange domain when fetch messages · 5937d13c
      Jérome Maes authored
      When fetching messages from the portal controller, we might
      give a domain to restrict the message selection. Typically,
      the ecommerce allows users to submit messages with rating
      of the product. Users are allowed to filter the messages
      with a certain rating.
      Passing a non-normalized domain to this controller could
      give strange result, as the code was using `+=` to concat
      domains; some result domain could have been correct, but
      return some strange results.
      
      This commit normalizes all domains used in the code
      making a non-normalized domain (given as parameter) crashes,
      instead of returning unexpected messages.
      
      Closes #26939
      5937d13c
    • Odoo Translation Bot's avatar
  15. Sep 14, 2018
    • Martin Trigaux's avatar
      [FIX] account_asset: use the last day of fiscal year for depreciation date · a307d4fc
      Martin Trigaux authored
      The depreciation was hardcoded as starting the first of January.
      If a user changed the configuration to set a different value than 31/12 it had
      no impact.
      
      In saas-11.3, this was improved to allow to configure the behaviour at 805f3a61
      
      opw-1878927
      Unverified
      a307d4fc
    • Lucas Perais (lpe)'s avatar
      [FIX] point_of_sale: param for reconcile orders and payment · 9511cb2b
      Lucas Perais (lpe) authored
      It has been argued that a regression took place because of e2efec8e
      Before that commit, everything was reconciled together
      After, only payments and orders with a partner set were
      
      While that commit improved performances (there are much less move lines to reconcile),
      it introduced an inconvenience business wise because of the noise created
      by the unreconciled lines
      
      This commit proposes to cut the pear in half by introducing an ir parameter
      to choose between the two options
      
      OPW 1883594
      closes #26971
      9511cb2b
  16. Sep 13, 2018
Loading