- Oct 05, 2011
-
-
Antony Lesuisse authored
bzr revid: al@openerp.com-20111005165202-s3jv23v7n5py4mx1
-
Antony Lesuisse authored
bzr revid: al@openerp.com-20111005163514-dzvvpsdg1hhhzb5t
-
Stéphane Wirtel authored
bzr revid: stw@openerp.com-20111005145931-piwiavbep6sr8nx3
-
Stéphane Wirtel authored
bzr revid: stw@openerp.com-20111005145855-hu14h1whjiv669iq
-
Stéphane Wirtel authored
bzr revid: stw@openerp.com-20111005145822-r0thbg86zt52lis3
-
Stéphane Wirtel authored
bzr revid: stw@openerp.com-20111005141932-mw8n1ccs1msino92
-
Stéphane Wirtel authored
bzr revid: stw@openerp.com-20111005141902-72du0lku4x176ix9
-
Nicolas Vanhoren authored
[fix] problem with the idea module trying to override the 'active_id' context key, which it should not bzr revid: nicolas.vanhoren@openerp.com-20111005095633-v53hjz3fkwlb3fso
-
Nicolas Vanhoren authored
bzr revid: nicolas.vanhoren@openerp.com-20111005093600-xjyqrmpoqywy1ztq
-
Nicolas Vanhoren authored
bzr revid: nicolas.vanhoren@openerp.com-20111005093237-22dbe1jwbkqk18pt
-
Xavier Morel authored
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20111005090518-3ht49k8s6vtrxhwl
-
Fabien Meghazi authored
lp bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/865945 fixed bzr revid: fme@openerp.com-20111005083656-f5bq8v1km25s4orx
-
Fabien Meghazi authored
bzr revid: fme@openerp.com-20111005083521-ofyfzdp8olzpjnbd
-
Launchpad authored
bzr revid: launchpad_translations_on_behalf_of_openerp-20111005044429-thiikup2n1y3ayb9
-
Antony Lesuisse authored
bzr revid: al@openerp.com-20111005001643-ngs7quhipn79gauu
-
Antony Lesuisse authored
bzr revid: al@openerp.com-20111004231832-8hx5233nm031nuhs
-
Antony Lesuisse authored
bzr revid: al@openerp.com-20111004231534-ay78ghc46ihb91mx
-
Antony Lesuisse authored
bzr revid: al@openerp.com-20111004223410-pbwkn5k4zq9ze1mj
-
Antony Lesuisse authored
bzr revid: al@openerp.com-20111004222640-ako0cjw414c5lz72
-
- Oct 04, 2011
-
-
Nicolas Vanhoren authored
bzr revid: nicolas.vanhoren@openerp.com-20111004161116-6pylm16ty6v69szu
-
Xavier Morel authored
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20111004155918-c2vy0rwkesvdkmli
-
Xavier Morel authored
[FIX] stupidity: if insert a line in a list with more than 5 records (no padding), since the new line does not have a @data-id yet it's going to remove it immediately. select line to remove before inserting new one bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20111004155746-q13ieg0q6lsy1uf7
-
Xavier Morel authored
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20111004154650-hx56g1lmefhzgf21
-
Xavier Morel authored
[FIX] insertion position of new lines (in editable lists) in case of lists padded to 5 (empty) lines bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20111004154246-7o1cw016cf9ygem3
-
Xavier Morel authored
Form fields are extended/replaced in editable list view in order to handle @invisible and @tree_invisible correctly in editable-list-form context (base semantics of @invisible are different between listview and formview, formview's @invisible is listview's @tree_invisible, and instead of removing element from visible DOM listview's @invisible only hides the element but it keeps the space it's taking). As a result, listview editable needs to override Widget.update_dom for pretty much all form widgets, in order to manage this difference in behavior. In case of @tree_invisible, it did so correctly setting and unsetting its stuff and calling this.super() to execute the widget's actual update_dom triggers **but it did not do so when the element was really visible**. As a result, in editable listview elements would never appear required (blue background), invalid (red background) or disabled (gray), although they were correctly set up, because the display layer was never updated. bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20111004151031-65o0q8e86op7kdks
-
Vo Minh Thu authored
bzr revid: vmt@openerp.com-20111004143335-7etc6y2kje1y20ef
-
Vaibhav Darji authored
bzr revid: vda@tinyerp.com-20111004133753-kptuu127azazrmg6
-
Stéphane Wirtel authored
bzr revid: stw@openerp.com-20111004133613-d2pv1csgin2bwfee
-
Xavier Morel authored
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20111004132854-sg8vo4m3b4bvtecf
-
Xavier Morel authored
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20111004124125-34rjj54k2fe0locu
-
Xavier Morel authored
[FIX] re-rendering of a given list's row (e.g. onchange, edition, etc...): 'view' needs to be in the context so the row's color can be computed bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20111004104848-277ajqmaud8oc8hn
-
Xavier Morel authored
I don't remember why I did that originally, it does not seem to serve any purpose and it causes problems in case of records with binary fields bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20111004102115-lz6kgyiw35vp1t99
-
Valentin Lab authored
bzr revid: valentin.lab@kalysto.org-20111004102050-http3jvu0sf78fmx
-
Fabien Meghazi authored
The views doesn't have to worry about the search in do_show(). They just have to listen to do_search() if they are searchable. bzr revid: fme@openerp.com-20111004094738-at91ab6a2kkxf8bq
-
Vaibhav Darji authored
lp bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/865945 fixed bzr revid: vda@tinyerp.com-20111004094009-u1vkb6s0u90629rz
-
Vo Minh Thu authored
bzr revid: vmt@openerp.com-20111004092828-79hhaiwgw4dltimd
-
Xavier Morel authored
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20111004085119-ll3x1s2r2akcm8p2
-
Fabien Meghazi authored
bzr revid: fme@openerp.com-20111004075039-n8a30wnuueiwnbwt
-
Valentin Lab authored
bzr revid: valentin.lab@kalysto.org-20111004074321-b2z121y64yynt948
-
Valentin Lab authored
bzr revid: valentin.lab@kalysto.org-20111004072424-uwx50578hhafe2xm
-