- Mar 08, 2023
-
-
Walid HANNICHE (waha) authored
Steps to reproduce: - select a different company from the main one - under settings/discuss enable External Email Servers - set up an alias domain - create an SO and send it by email (you can catch the sent email using mailhog) - reply to that email (you can use the support-tools[1] and set In-Reply-To: "previous message_id") Bug: the reply_to field of incoming message defaults to the first company Fix: set the reply_to field to the company asociated to the record (there's already a fallback to self.env.company in "_notify_get_reply_to_formatted_email") opw-3060214 [1]: https://github.com/odoo/support-tools/tree/master/scripts/mail closes odoo/odoo#108823 Signed-off-by:
Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
-
Paolo Gatti (pgi) authored
If an invoice is send to the Tax Agency, we should block the fact that the user can delete it. In that case, we can have issues when the tax agency sends back notifications. Task link: https://www.odoo.com/web#id=3192962&model=project.task Task-3192962 closes odoo/odoo#113079 Signed-off-by:
Josse Colpaert <jco@odoo.com>
-
Raphael Collet authored
Consider a form view with a one2many field, which has no form subview. Also the form view of the comodel (the one2many field's lines) contains the inverse many2one field of the one2many field. When adding a new line on some existing record, the form view shows the many2one field as empty, instead of being the main record. Explanation: the form view of the line invokes onchange() with the main record's values (dict) as the value of the many2one field. Inside onchange(), the field is actually set to a new record corresponding to the main record. Alas, when that value is sent back to the form, the new record is serialized as False. Solution: let onchange() serialize the new record as its origin record instead. closes odoo/odoo#114614 Signed-off-by:
Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
-
- Mar 07, 2023
-
-
qsm-odoo authored
Bootstrap tables can basically be customized with the `$table-bg` and `$table-color` variables. The problem is that, by default, BS4 defines them so that the background-color is null (so transparent: displaying the background-color of its ancestors) but the color is forced to the body color (by default: white). This is a problem as soon as the ancestors background colors are a color close to the body text color: the text becomes invisible. For instance, in website: - Set a body background color to black, the body text will automatically become white. - Add a table in a snippet: still ok, the text in the table is white over the black body (the table being transparent). - Then set the snippet background to white -> the table text will still be white... but now over a white background. This should be reviewed in master: it should be ok to set the variable $table-color to `null` thus letting the table be transparent and have the same text color as its parent. But in stable, changing a color variable to `null` could break customizations relying on the fact this is a set color. It would also not make sense if the user set up a `$table-bg` value going well with table text forced to the body color. Instead, here, in the very specific case we have a transparent table bg and table color equal to the body color, we temporarily unset the table color variable for the duration of the bootstrap table rules. Note: we cannot create a rule in an "Odoo file" to fix this as unsetting the color for the `.table` rule would also unset the color in the case of a `.table.bg-XXX` where we still want `.bg-XXX` to force the color. task-2728923 opw-3048306 opw-3180568 closes odoo/odoo#82357 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
Antoine (ande) authored
To reproduce the issue: 1. Create an RFQ 2. Send it by email 3. Open link in email in incognito 4. URL in mail redirects to a login page Error: Should be able to see the RFQ without being logged in Backport of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/87520/commits/c4bd3f450c571da1322acb464f837612d498647c Which is a backport of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/139e90027686b0471c3f2c9efa46d531c3abef5a OPW-3175464 closes odoo/odoo#114541 Signed-off-by:
William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
-
Hansun (hale) authored
1. Install CRM, Dashboards as admin 2. On Settings, enable Google Spreadsheet 3. Click on Dashboard, Google Spreadsheet - key in data with actual URL 4. Log out and log back in as Marc Demo - you cannot access Google Spreadsheet in Dashboard Desired: enable the menu for partial visibility opw-3055142 closes odoo/odoo#114152 Signed-off-by:
Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
-
Merel Geens (mege) authored
If you specify an empty VAT number in the Contacts app, it will store it as `False` in the ORM. If a new partner is created through the shop, the VAT number is set through HTML form submission. It will use `''` for an empty VAT number. When evaluating the VAT number in Python code, it will usually be converted to a boolean, so it doesn't matter if it's `False` or `''`. But in ORM queries those are two different values and code that checks on `False` to check for the presence of a VAT number can misinterpret `''` as being one. This fix replaces `''` values submitted through the address form in the shop with `False`. opw-3114246 closes odoo/odoo#112807 Signed-off-by:
Merel Geens <mege@odoo.com>
-
Laurent Desausoi authored
In some cases, wkhtmltopdf might exit with an error (e.g.: a memory limit). In such cases, we want to show to the user the error returned by wkhtmltopdf. Previously, this message was only displayed in binary format (displayed as "Message: b'My error\n'") which is not user-friendly. We want this message to be decoded so that it is a bare string (displayed as "Message: My error"). closes odoo/odoo#112901 Signed-off-by:
Vincent Schippefilt (vsc) <vsc@odoo.com>
-
Solan Delvenne (sode) authored
If an user tries sending a invoice using an invoice address and a delivery address through snailmail, it would result in a traceback. This is due to the invoice address record not having a name. closes odoo/odoo#114159 X-original-commit: eceb23b1 Signed-off-by:
Florian Daloze (fda) <fda@odoo.com> Signed-off-by:
Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
-
Antoine (ande) authored
To reproduce the issue: 1. In Accounting, settings, activate Analytic Accounting 2. Head over to the purchase module, create an RFQ 3. Add a POL to the RFQ, with an analytic account specified 4. Save the RFQ 5. Edit the RFQ, and change the Order Deadline 6. The analytic account in the POL has disappeared Error: The analytic account should not disappear When modifying the deadline, the analytic account was always being replaced, even if the replacement was empty. In the same version (14.0), the same fix can be found in AML: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1dcd071b27779e7d6d8f536c7dce7002d27212ba/addons/account/models/account_move.py#L3583-L3584 In 16.0, the issue doesn't need to be fixed, as it has already been fixed, by a similar fix, as seen in POL: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/c677f45dcb050ce7e6f755b71e56c9b9120bf613/addons/purchase/models/purchase.py#L1153 OPW-3159905 closes odoo/odoo#114326 Signed-off-by:
Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
-
- Mar 06, 2023
-
-
Benjamin Vray authored
Before this commit, the customize panel backdrop did not fully cover the customize panel when the vertical scrollbar was scrolled to the bottom. Steps to reproduce the bug: - In website edit mode, add a table of content snippet to the page. - Add a three columns snippet within the table of content. - Click on an image in the three columns snippet. - Scroll the customize panel to the bottom and open the filter selector of the image. - Bug: the backdrop does not fully cover the customization panel. task-3090626 closes odoo/odoo#110238 Signed-off-by:
Outagant Mehdi (mou) <mou@odoo.com>
-
Walid HANNICHE (waha) authored
Step to reproduce: Edit documents layout in general setting to add logo and background select multiple documents (more than 5) e.g. Inventory> delivery slips print all documents. Bug: background and logo missing on the last documents because the pages were printed before the browser had time to render them Fix: wkhtml2pdf has a default delay of 200 ms (--javascript-delay) increasing the value will allow large document to load opw-2951594 closes odoo/odoo#113560 Signed-off-by:
Julien Castiaux (juc) <juc@odoo.com>
-
Soukéina Bojabza authored
When using the 'Show on mobile' option, we can see that there is a mismatch between the screen breakpoint at which the elements are displayed like in mobile view (=> under 992px or `lg`) and the one that is impacted by the 'Hide/Show' option (=> under 768px or `md`). This is a problem because between these two breakpoints, the display is like in mobile view but is not considered as such and so, hiding an element in the mobile view (for example, if it does not look good in it) has no effect until the screen reaches 768px. This commit increases the screen breakpoint at which the 'Show on mobile' option is applied, that is, up to 992px instead of 768px, in order to be consistent with the display. task-3110770 closes odoo/odoo#109053 Signed-off-by:
Benoit Socias (bso) <bso@odoo.com>
-
Nasreddin Boulif (bon) authored
Steps to reproduce: - Install `Contacts` module - Create 3 contacts with the same name - Archive one of the contacts - Go to list view - Edit search filter to display archived and non archived contacts - Select the 3 created contacts - Open `Action` menu and click on `Merge` Issues: - Archived partner is set by default as destination partner. - Archived partner is not displayed in the list of partners to merge. Cause: - The default destination partner set is the last record of the record set returned by `_get_ordered_partner` (where `Archived` partners are the last ones in the record set). - The field `partner_ids` does not allow archived records. Solution: - Sort the partners to have the archived ones on top (since we took the last one). - Set `active_test` to False in the context of the partner_ids field. opw-3205577 closes odoo/odoo#113778 Signed-off-by:
Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
-
Julien (jula) authored
__Description of the issue this PR addresses:__ The first character of a Tax ID from Albania is a letter representing the decade in which it has been issued. The letter M represents the current decade. (This pdf explains in details how it is formated: https://www.oecd.org/tax/automatic-exchange/crs-implementation-and-assistance/tax-identification-numbers/Albania-TIN.pdf). Currently the way Albanian Tax IDs are validated is through the python library [`python-stdnum`](https://pypi.org/project/python-stdnum/). However, the regex that is used to validate them has not been updated since 2017. (I made a PR in its repo https://github.com/arthurdejong/python-stdnum/pull/402 to fix that). The code from this commit is inspired by the one from that library, but the regex includes the letter M. __Current behavior before PR:__ (`base_vat` must be installed) By going to Settings > Users & Companies > [A company]: - Set the country to Albania - Set VAT/Tax ID to “M12345678T”. => Error message closes odoo/odoo#114006 Signed-off-by:
Nicolas Viseur (vin) <vin@odoo.com>
-
Andrea Grazioso (agr-odoo) authored
Fixing typo in df74fb68 closes odoo/odoo#114412 Signed-off-by:
Josse Colpaert <jco@odoo.com>
-
Yolann Sabaux authored
Steps to reproduce: - Create a new journal Bank - In Sequence, find the 'New Bank Check" and edit it so the sequence can be 10 number digits long - Create a Vendor Payments with the the New Banck and Check as a method - Click on Print a check - Set the check number to 2147483648 and validate - Create a new payment with the check method - Click on Print a check Issue: Error is raised Cause: As for https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/112832 there is a second check in order to increment the check number opw-3140973 closes odoo/odoo#114393 Signed-off-by:
John Laterre (jol) <jol@odoo.com>
-
Pierre-Yves Dufays authored
Add a test that check recipients displayed in the template preview. This test has been added following the fix that solves the template "partner_to" not displayed in the preview. Task-3196081 closes odoo/odoo#113341 Signed-off-by:
Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
-
Pierre-Yves Dufays authored
To reproduce the problem (example): - install the project app with demo data - activate the debug mode - go to Settings -> Technical -> Templates - choose the template "Task: Rating Request" - in email configuration, "To (partners)" is set to ${object.rating_get_partner_id().id} - click on preview - choose the task: "Room 2: Decoration" - the "Recipients" field value should be "YourCompany, Joel Willis" but this field remains empty without the fix Technical note: partner_to of the template was not rendered which was making generate_recipients returning incorrect values for partner_ids. Task-3196081 Part-of: odoo/odoo#113341
-
- Mar 05, 2023
-
-
Odoo Translation Bot authored
-
- Mar 03, 2023
-
-
Adrien Widart (awt) authored
To reproduce the issue: (Also need: account_accountant,purchase) 1. Setup a product P - Storable - Category: - FIFO + Auto 2. Process a PO with 1 x P at $10 3. Process a PO with 1 x P at $50 4. Create and confirm a SO with 1 x P - Because of FIFO, the value of the delivered product is $10 5. Process the delivery 6. Post the invoice 7. Add credit note - Credit Method: Full refund and new draft invoice 8. Post the second invoice Error: The cogs are based on the second received product ($50), they should rather be based on the delivered one When computing the anglo-saxon unit price of the product, we consume the outgoing SVLs, and we consider the already-invoiced quantity. Here is the issue: we pretend that this quantity is 1, because of the first invoice, but this should be balanced with the quantity of the credit note OPW-3109789 closes odoo/odoo#114054 Signed-off-by:
William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
-
Julien Van Roy authored
The BuyerReference (BT-10) should be easily editable by the user, so it is read from the `commercial_partner_id.ref`. The OrderReference (BT-13) should also be editable by the user, it is read from the `move.ref`. The definition for both tags in the peppol doc defines these tags as: "An identifier assigned by the Buyer used for internal routing purposes". The new tag SalesOrderId (BT-14) is added, and is the sale order's name linked to the invoice. opw-3175906 closes odoo/odoo#114291 Signed-off-by:
Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
-
Benjamin Vray authored
This commit fixes two bugs with the table of content snippet: - Before this commit, the scrollspy position for the table of content navbar was incorrect in fullscreen or edit mode due to the calculation being based on the presence of the main navbar, which is not present in those modes. - Before this commit, when the table of content navbar contained enough elements to exceed the height of the page, the bottom elements were not accessible without first scrolling through the entire table of content. This commit addresses this issue by adding a scrollbar to the navbar, allowing for easier access to these links. opw-3115597 closes odoo/odoo#109927 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
Louis (loco) authored
Steps to reproduce the bug: - Go to the website and edit a page. - Make sure there is enough content to be able to scroll the page. - Go to the "Theme" tab and disable the "Show Header" option. - Click on the footer and enable the "Scroll Top Button". - Click on "Save". => Clicking on the "Scroll To Top" button does nothing. The "Scroll To Top" button is an anchor with its `href` set to `#top`. By disabling the "Show Header" option, the header is removed from the DOM and there is no existing element with `id=top` anymore. To fix this, the `scrollTo` function has been patched in order to be able to receive selectors as arguments. In the '#top' and '#bottom' case, those positions are known and always the same (either at the top of the document or the bottom of it) so there is no need to have the header or the footer present in the DOM in order to be able to scroll up to those positions. Now that the `scrollTo` function is able to scroll to the top or the bottom of the page even without header or footer, those two positions can always be suggested as internal link anchors during link edition. opw-3133464 closes odoo/odoo#113117 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
Arthur Detroux (ard) authored
Prior to this commit, the height of the Image Gallery snippet was set to auto on screens smaller than 400px. This ensures that the snippet looks the best on phones. However, when using Bootstrap, what defines a smaller screen is not any screen below 400px, but any screen below 768px. This meant that the Image Gallery snippet did not look the same on an iPhone 11 Pro max as it would on an iPhone 11 for example. This commit fixes that by using the built-in mixin that relies on Bootstrap's breakpoints (in this case SM). Steps to reproduce: - Go in edit mode and drop an "Image Gallery" snippet - Open the dev tools and choose "iPhone 11" or 375x812 - The image gallery does not have white bands - Change the resolution to "iPhone 11 Pro Max" or 414x896 - The image gallery has white bands / has a different layout opw-2995100 task-2997119 closes odoo/odoo#109761 Signed-off-by:
Vray Benjamin (bvr) <bvr@odoo.com>
-
Maruan Aguerdouh (magm) authored
Steps to reproduce: - Install purchase and discuss. - Go to the purchase list view. - You will see the purchase lines in bold. Issue: The bold lines are supposed to indicate that we have unreaded messages in the chatter, but they are not working as expected, and instead it is mixed with discuss, and they bold line won't dissappear until we send a message in discuss. Solution: We removed from the views the "feature" of showing bold lines as it is not well implemented, and it is not working as expected. This will avoid confusion for the clients on not knowing what it is for, and when it's bold or when it's not. Also this feature was removed in future versions. Extra info: If you don't have any lines in bold, and you realize they don't appear when you send messages through the chatter. The easiest way I found to test it is removing `cp.channel_id = msg.res_id AND ` from the SQL query in the code inside `_compute_message_unread`. With this you will see the bold row whenever you send a message in the chatter, but it won't dissappear when you open the RfQ. Forward bot up to saas-15.2. opw-3185071 closes odoo/odoo#113166 Signed-off-by:
William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
-
sofiagvaladze authored
The method update_state is called from cron. When the contracts are updated couple things are checked. There are constraints set that can throw ValidationError. As a result, none of the contract states are updated. In this PR we do the following: In case the ValidationError occurs when we run the cron, we update contracts that can be updated, and silently pass the invalid contracts. task - 3069480 bloupbloup closes odoo/odoo#110941 Related: odoo/enterprise#36771 Signed-off-by:
Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
-
Benjamin Vray authored
This commit fixes an issue with the width of items in the we-list not being correct when they are being dragged using jQuery's sortable feature. Steps to reproduce the bug: - Drop a "Form" snippet on a page. - Add a "Multiple Checkboxes" field in the form. - Move an option from the list using the move button. - Bug: while dragging the item, the width of the items is too small. When an element is dragged, it is given an absolute position which takes it out of the normal flow of the document, causing the input element within the list item to no longer be able to correctly occupy 100% of the available width. task-3138662 closes odoo/odoo#110871 Signed-off-by:
Guillaume-gdi <gdi@odoo.com>
-
- Mar 02, 2023
-
-
Valentin Vallaeys (vava) authored
For the moment, the price unit of the down payment line on the sale order is not always correctly computed. If the price unit is updated on the down payment invoice, it is not updated on the sale order; or if a regular invoice is created, the price unit of the down payment is set to zero on the sale order. This commit corrects the behavior by using the unit price of the invoice line. opw-3140740 opw-3160406 opw-3160420 closes odoo/odoo#113769 Signed-off-by:
Vallaeys Valentin (vava) <vava@odoo.com>
-
Abdelouahab (abla) authored
To reproduce ============ - on accounting -> Vendor -> Bills - upload the PDF attached on the ticket an exception is raised Problem ======= PyPDF2 finds that this pdf is encrypted,so we try to decrypt it with empty password, but the decryption fails which rise an error. Solution ======== according to this [commit](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/851fe64f7789bb398383c22e3ebbaebb051791f6 ), when the decryption fails we skip reading the attachments and carry on to allow the user to upload the document. opw-3196780 closes odoo/odoo#114050 Signed-off-by:
William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
-
Adrien Widart (awt) authored
OPW-3115528 closes odoo/odoo#108072 Signed-off-by:
Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
-
William Henrotin authored
To reproduce the issue: 1. Create a product: - Type: Storable - Category: - Costing Method: AVCO 2. IN 1000 @ 0.17 3. IN 800 @ 0.23 4. OUT 1000 5. OUT 800 6. Open the inventory valuation of the product Error: the total value is $-6.00, it should be zero Once all products received, the standard price is $0.20. Its value has been rounded because the real value is `(1000 * .17 + 800 * .23) / 1800 = 0,196666667` The standard price will create a difference when using the products, because: `(1800 * .20 = 360) != (1000 * .17 + 800 * .23 = 354)` That's the reason why a feature tries to compensate such rounding errors. So, step 4, when preparing the values of the out-SVL, we check if there is a rounding error, and we find a difference of $6, which is correct. However, the difference is above the treshold, so we will not consider it as a rounding error: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/3ff51daa93a1d670b8f67f79418d4dd48e94875f/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L197-L200 Here is the issue: the threshold is based on the outgoing quantity (1000) while the value difference is based on the whole quantity (1800). This difference should also be proportional to the outgoing quantity. Note: The fix will still not work with a small quantity. The only and best solution is to change the type of the SVL unit cost into a float. OPW-3101374 Part-of: odoo/odoo#108072 Co-authored-by:
Adrien Widart (awt) <awt@odoo.com>
-
Elias Regopoulos authored
If the IBAN includes a non-ASCII alphanumeric character and has just the right length, the IBAN validation crashes with a KeyError before validation can take place. Fictional example: The supposed IBAN code "Bank München-Wiesn GmbH" gets normalized to "BankMünchenWiesnGmbH"; a string that starts with a valid country code ('BA', ie. Bosnia-Herzegovina) and happens to have the same length as Bosnia-Herzegovina's IBAN format (20 characters). Normally this erroneous IBAN would've been rejected as invalid, but Python throws a KeyError when trying to convert 'ü' to an int right before the validation step. We therefore need to also check if all characters in the IBAN code are within the expected range, namely [a-zA-Z0-9] (strictly speaking, the IBAN's specification range is only [A-Z0-9], but we can be lenient since Python's `int()` is case-insensitive). closes odoo/odoo#113719 X-original-commit: fc468f5a Signed-off-by:
Josse Colpaert <jco@odoo.com> Signed-off-by:
Elias <elre@odoo.com>
-
Thomas Lefebvre (thle) authored
Steps to reproduce: - create a sale order; - add products which are based on timesheets for invoicing policy; - create an invoice an confirm it; - make a full refund for this invoice with "ADD CREDIT NOTE" button; - create an new invoice for the sale order. Issue: There is no longer a statistics button that displays the hours worked on the invoice view. Cause: To reassign an account move to an account analytic line, it is necessary either that there is no invoice or that the invoice is in the cancel state. The case where the invoice has been refunded is not taken into account. Solution: Correct the domain that determines the timesheets (account analytic line) to be linked with the invoice being created. opw-3187219 closes odoo/odoo#113985 Signed-off-by:
Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
-
- Mar 01, 2023
-
-
Abdelouahab (abla) authored
To reproduce ============ - with Invoicing installed, give a user the group Billing Administrator without giving any Administration group - connect to this user and try to add a bank account an access right is raised Problem ======= the `groups_id` on the action `action_new_bank_setting` is not specified so when runing the action we check if it has `groups_id`, if not, we check if the user has the right to write on the target model which is `res.company` here, which is not for this user because he doesn't have any Administration group. Solution ======== specify `groups_id` to `account.group_account_manager` opw-3199435 closes odoo/odoo#113836 Signed-off-by:
William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
-
Loan (LSE) authored
backward port of: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/113768 Before this commit: If a payulatam payment is received from the confirmation page (so, with the webhook). If the value have some decimals it might be rounded in the wrong way. As such, the generated signature to compare with is wrong and the payment validation cancelled After this commit If we cross compare the signature generation documentation: https://developers.payulatam.com/latam/en/docs/integrations/webcheckout-integration/response-page.html#signature-validation https://developers.payulatam.com/latam/en/docs/integrations/webcheckout-integration/confirmation-page.html#signature-validation We notice that the `new_value` computation is slightly different depending on the return. The one we currently use for both method is the "return" one which is computed differently from the "confirm" one. With this change of code a "confirmation" page payment will be validated as intended. I also changed the log level from warning to exception so that the traceback and exception message is logged. Before this commit there was just a generic warning message opw-3018628 closes odoo/odoo#113987 X-original-commit: 0e29f948 Signed-off-by:
Loan (LSE) <lse@odoo.com> Signed-off-by:
Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
-
Andrea Grazioso (agr-odoo) authored
To generate an e-faktur 1. Settings > Users & Companies/Compagnies: - Create a new company ‘ID Indonesia’: - Set the state (e.g Yogyakarta (ID)) - Set the country ‘Indonesia’ 2. Accounting > Customers > e-Faktur - Set a range of numbers (which are supposed to be assigned by the Indonesian government) 3. Accounting > Configuration > Settings - Fiscal Localization: select the Indonesian package 4. Accounting > Customers > Customers - Create a new res.partner: - Set the country ‘Indonesia’ - Check ‘ID PKP’ field - Fill Tax Address field - Fill NIK field - Under ‘Accounting tab’: set both accounting entries (Receivable + Payable) - Create a delivery address 5. Accounting > Customers > Invoices - Create a random invoice with the res.partner set in point 5. as the Customer - Confirm the invoice - Action > Download e-Faktur Under column ALAMAT LENGKAP the tax Address will be used, but the delivery address should be used Follows the official documentation with translation https://www.pajakku.com/tax-guide/12490/PER_DIRJEN_PJK/PER - 03/PJ/2022 (Article 6, paragraph 6) Translation: Paragraph 2 : The identity of the Buyer of Taxable Goods and Services or the Recipient of Taxable Goods and Services which includes name, address, NPWP, NIK, and passport number as referred to in Article 5 letter b must be filled in accordance with the actual or actual name, address, NPWP, NIK, and passport number. Paragraph 6 : In the event that the delivery of Taxable Goods and/or Taxable Service is made to the Buyer of Taxable Goods and/or Receiver of Taxable Service which is the place where the VAT or VAT and STLG payable is concentrated, but the Taxable Goods and/or Taxable Service is sent or delivered to the place where the VAT or VAT and STLG payable is centralized, the following provisions shall apply: a. the name and NPWP as referred to in paragraph (2) shall be the name and NPWP of PKP where the VAT or VAT and STLG payable is centralized; and b. the address as referred to in paragraph (2) shall be the address of the place where the VAT or VAT and STLG payable that is centralized receives the Taxable Goods and/or Services. opw-2878096 closes odoo/odoo#94338 Signed-off-by:
Josse Colpaert <jco@odoo.com>
-
Guillaume (gdi) authored
Before this commit, we-matrix could create a horizontal scroll bar in the editor. This was because the inputs had a minimum width size. Steps to reproduce the bug: - Drop a chart block on a page - Add some series => The matrix overflows from the editor. There is no perfect solution to this problem... We have the choice between: 1) Leave the existing overflow on the editor. 2) Put a horizontal scroll on the we-matrix. 3) Distribute the available space between the columns. As we don't want a horizontal scrollbar, the best solution is to distribute the available space between the columns. This solution has a drawback which is that the cells can become really small if there are a lot of columns but this solution seems to be the least bad from a UX point of view. task-3094162 closes odoo/odoo#107400 Signed-off-by:
Bojabza Soukéina (sobo) <sobo@odoo.com>
-
Romain Derie authored
With DB having only one blog (most common case, but we are used to test it with demo data where we have two), the query params are lost when accessing the blog controller without passing a blog. Eg, `/blog?search=hubble` will redirect to `/blog/traval-1` This is because the business code is doing an early redirect if we access the `/blog` URL without a blog post passed to it to redirect to that blog post URL directly (since there is only one), but that redirect is not passing the query parameters. The main impacted params are `state`, `order` and `search` but it's the same for all others. Step to reproduce (in later version): - Be sure to only have one blog - Drag & drop the search snippet in the homepage or anywhere - Make it search on blog only (through the snippet option) Type anything, it will not work and won't do the search. It will just redirect to the blog page. closes odoo/odoo#113855 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
Louis (loco) authored
Before this commit, the user had the possibility to spam the "Log in" button when trying to connect. This could lead to a change of the CSFR token and an errror of type "werkzeug.exceptions.BadRequest: 400 Bad Request: Session expired (invalid CSRF token)" could then happen. This commit makes the “Log in” button un-clickable once it has been clicked and adds a loading effect to it. task-2996329 closes odoo/odoo#104323 Signed-off-by:
Benoit Socias (bso) <bso@odoo.com>
-