- Nov 18, 2022
-
-
Victor Piryns (pivi) authored
Current behaviour: When we are printing a report and then the report fails to generate (for ex. wkhtmltopdf memory limit/timeout), the incorrect state is committed to the database. Expected behaviour: We should rollback when generating reports fails, since it is an error state. Steps to reproduce: To reproduce the behaviour, we need to force an error state. - In odoo/addons/base/models/ir_actions_report.py:`_run_wkhtmltopdf()`, raise an exception before spawning the subprocess (for ex. adding a 1/0). - In addons/web/controllers/main.py:`report_download()`#L2126, add this little code snippet: ```python ids = [int(x) for x in docids.split(",")] report = request.env['ir.actions.report']._get_report_from_name(reportname) obj = request.env[report.model].browse(ids) if getattr(obj, 'message_post'): obj.message_post(body='This report was committed!') ``` - Install Inventory - Pick a delivery order and try to print it, there should be an error (whatever exception you decided to raise in `_run_wkhtmltopdf()`) - See that in the message board we got a message that the report has been committed, which isn't the case, it failed to generate. Reason for the problem: Controllers are catching the exception when generating reports, but never reset the state of the database. Fix: Raise an InternalServerError with an error code of 500 to trigger a database rollback. Affected versions: - 14.0 - 15.0 - saas-15.2 - saas-15.3 - 16.0 - master opw-3001950 closes odoo/odoo#106027 X-original-commit: d7fdcdce Related: odoo/enterprise#34113 Signed-off-by:
Julien Castiaux <juc@odoo.com> Signed-off-by:
Piryns Victor (pivi) <pivi@odoo.com>
-
Touati Djamel (otd) authored
Stpes to reproduce the bug: - Install mrp_plm - Enable by-product option in the mrp settings - Create a storable product P1 with BoM: - Type: manufacture - Component: C1 - By-product: P2 - save - Click on the “Structure & cost” button - Unfold the By-Products section Problem: Columns of the byproducts values are placed wrong, because it lacks two empty <td/> which should be added normally here: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/10c6f4e8379c4c9c4084dd55d4d7bf1c34524d50/addons/mrp/report/mrp_report_bom_structure.xml#L233-L235 But 'extra_column_count' has a value of 0, so no empty <td/> is added Solution: The `_get_extra_column_count` function should be called in the `get_by_products` function so that the value is set to 2 instead of 0: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/26e3c4718ac2baae61ae2c5950adb4cb2251b507/mrp_plm/report/mrp_report_bom_structure.py#L41-L42 opw-3025823 closes odoo/odoo#106001 Signed-off-by:
William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
-
gawa-odoo authored
Steps to reproduce: - Create two orders on a table with some products - Go back to the FloorScreen - Go back to the table and add a product - Go to the TicketScreen and take the other order - Go back to the first order and the added product won't appear This is due to the fact that when setting an order which is different than the current order through the TicketScreen will indirectly fetch the latest state of the table and bypass the syncing which happens in the FloorScreen. This is wrong as the fetching should only happens when going to a table and not navigating between the orders of the same table. closes odoo/odoo#105962 Signed-off-by:
Masereel Pierre <pim@odoo.com>
-
Rodopho Cammarosano de Lima (rcdl) authored
When the test suit is run in Chrome with zoom level different than 100%, the tests than toggle list checkboxes fail. This is due to the lack of the "view" option in the simulated MouseClick event. When not present, it defaults to null and the mouse coordinates get messed up when the zoom level is not 100%. This affects only the tests, not the actual application. task# 3062132 closes odoo/odoo#105979 Signed-off-by:
David Monjoie (dmo) <dmo@odoo.com>
-
Thomas Lefebvre (thle) authored
Steps to reproduce: - go to Contacts app; - add a reporting view (Graph, Pivot or Dashboard) (with studio for example) - tape any character in the search bar; - on "search related company for" field either use the arrow keys to go down to this and then click the right arrow key or click on the triangle to the left of this field. Issue: An error occurs. Cause: There is a mismatch between the parameters that are sent by the rpc call and those processed by the logic part. Specifically, the domain must be part of the kwargs and not the args of the params key in the rpc call. The problem occurs with a filter that looks like: `<field name="parent_id" domain="[('is_company', '=', True)]" operator="child_of"/>` Solution: Move domain in kwargs under key named args in the params of the rpc call. opw-3031096 closes odoo/odoo#103795 Signed-off-by:
Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
-
Nshimiyimana Séna authored
Steps to reproduce: - Activate debug mode - Go to Sales and open a quotation (actually any form view from any module will do) - Start Studio - Select the "Confirm" button (or any of the top buttons) - Check the "Set approval rules" box - Edit the domain by clicking the 'filter' icon next to the 'trash' icon - Add a condition. You can just keep the default one. - Click save to save the domain. - Again, click on the 'filter' icon. You should see that the domain in the text editor is malformed. Furthermore, should you change the domain in the text editor (let's say, change 1 to 2) and hit save, an error message will pop saying the domain is not properly formatted. opw-3001622 closes odoo/odoo#101758 Signed-off-by:
Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
-
CarmenMiranda authored
Sending a context when you are closing a `pos.session` will allow you to make some validations/actions only when the closing is being done from the UI. For example, sending values for new fields or a message that includes something from the pos, like the Cashier ID, name, etc. Also, it will help more when it is necessary to inherit the function in a simpler way, to avoid having to overwrite it. closes odoo/odoo#97864 Signed-off-by:
Trinh Jacky (trj) <trj@odoo.com>
-
- Nov 17, 2022
-
-
William Henrotin authored
`quantity_svl` and `value_svl` field on product_product are computed from all the stock_valuation_layers As no `orderby` key is given, the `groupby` keys are used as orderby ones. In this particular case, the groups are done on `product_id` so the order is on the name of product_product. This order will add to the read_group query 3 joins from stock_valuation_layer table. - product_product - product_template for the name - ir_translation for the translation of the name This is completely useless in the scope of a computed field to get the sum of values and sum of quantities. As it not possible to ask read_group to not order the result. This commit call the method with the simplest order key possible: `id` closes odoo/odoo#105921 Opw: 3047017 Signed-off-by:
Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
-
William Henrotin authored
Fields `product_qty_available` and `product_virtual_available` on stock_move are related on quantities fields of move's product_id. On large database, those two fields will slow down every transactions that updates stock move state (confirmation, validation, ...). `state` on stock.move is a dependent field of computed field `qty_available` on product.product which is dependent field of related field `product_virtual_available` on stock move. This relation tree implies that updating the state on one particular stock move will mark its product (qty_available) as 'to be recomputed' and thus **every** stock moves (product_virtual_available) of this product as to be recomputed. On database will 100k+ stock move per product. Fetching all stock move of some products take 90% of a manufacturing order validation time. This is problematic knowing those two quantity fields are only used in the stock move tree form so computed anyway at the view rendering. This commit change the `depends` of those two related field to mark them as to be recomputed only if the product_id change. Opw: 3047017 Part-of: odoo/odoo#105921
-
qsm-odoo authored
Steps to reproduce the issue (see opw): - Add a form to a page - Add a checkbox - Add a second checkbox that is required and visible only if the first checkbox is not checked - Save - Do not check anything and try to send => Good, you can't, the required checkbox is not set - Check the second checkbox and try to send => Good, you can, the required checkbox is set - Go back to the empty form, check the first checkbox and try to send => Bad, you can't but you should: the required checkbox is hidden, it is not supposed to be required anymore. (Not that arguably, that two checkboxes setup should be replaced by a required selection field but the issue of the OPW would remain as there is another required conditionally-hidden field (a file upload) when the second checkbox is checked.) Conditionally-hidden fields should not require validation while they are hidden. Indeed, their purpose is to be able to enter additional data when some condition is fulfilled. If such a field is required, it is only required when visible. The problem only occurred with checkboxes, the other fields were already working in that case. Although there could be issues with dates too, this commit added a series of FIXME and TODO comments as well as some things need to be investigated. opw-3003952 closes odoo/odoo#105870 Signed-off-by:
Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
-
qsm-odoo authored
Before this commit, when submitting a website form which has invalid radio buttons, checkboxes or file upload elements, they had no visual difference. Now they will have red labels as intended with bootstrap. For alone checkboxes, a warning label will appear after the checkboxes. This will only take effects for newly added checkboxes. Related to opw-3003952 Part-of: odoo/odoo#105870
-
qsm-odoo authored
With [1], checkboxes in website forms were wrapped in a <div/> with the "form-check" bootstrap class (as they should). That forgot to mark the checkboxes themselves with the class "form-check-input". Without it they are misaligned. This fixes the error for newly added checkboxes in forms. Old ones will stay "broken". [1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/9ea276ae2f00c3a5ba4e10af313085947e70e265 Related to opw-3003952 Part-of: odoo/odoo#105870
-
qsm-odoo authored
Before this commit, if the user tried to setup a required selection field whose first value is empty, it was possible but the empty value appeared as a 0px-height div in the DOM preview. That empty value also shows up when trying to use the conditionally-hidden fields feature: if another field's visibility depends on such selection field, the editor UI was visually broken as the first choice was an empty option element. Now, we show "<no value>" in both cases. Note: this is not done in earlier versions than 15.0 although the problem exists, but it was decided that the real problem was about the visibility select being visually broken and that feature only appeared in 15.0. Related to opw-3003952 Part-of: odoo/odoo#105870
-
vishal padhiyar authored
Before this commit: When we try to create link manually and try to press enter cursor gets stuck. After this commit: Now when we create link manually and press enter cursor moves to next line. Task-2745129 closes odoo/odoo#100207 Signed-off-by:
David Monjoie (dmo) <dmo@odoo.com>
-
vishal padhiyar authored
Before this commit: When we try to copy paste link into another link then url of the old link does not change and only lable change. After this commit: Now when we try to copy paste link into another link then the url of the link changes with the label. Task-2768541 closes odoo/odoo#99569 Signed-off-by:
David Monjoie (dmo) <dmo@odoo.com>
-
vishal padhiyar authored
Before this commit: - When you try to paste text beside a text which is in code formate it puts the new text in new line with smaller font. - When we try to paste text in code formate in new line then it will give a blank space below the pasted text After this commit: - when you try to paste text beside a text which is in code formate it puts the pasted text in new line with original fontsize. - When we paste the text in code formate in new line then it will not give a empty line below it, Task-2683455 closes odoo/odoo#96763 Signed-off-by:
David Monjoie (dmo) <dmo@odoo.com>
-
Walid HANNICHE (waha) authored
Steps to reproduce: - Go to Purchase -> Reporting -> Dashboard - click on the "expand" arrows of the pivot view - favorites - add to dashboard Bug: adding a view with no actionID causes the dashboard to crash on load this [commit] prevents adding a view with no actionID Fix: added a default value of False to add_to_dashboard actionId only display the option to add_to_dashboard for views that have actionId opw-2965036 [commit]:https://github.com/odoo-dev/odoo/commit/7180d948f084d4f68d1660cb884c95aaf41288fa closes odoo/odoo#100043 Signed-off-by:
Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
-
- Nov 16, 2022
-
-
Adrien Widart (awt) authored
It is not possible to consume a component tracked by serial that comes back from a scrap location To reproduce the issue: 1. In Settings, enable "Multi Routes" 2. Create two storable products P_compo, P_finished - P_compo is tracked by serial number 3. Update the on-hand qty of P_compo: - 1 x P_compo with serial SN 4. Process a manufacturing order MO: - Product: P_finished - Compo: 1 x P_compo with SN 5. Unbuild P_finished - It brings SN back to stock 5. Scrap one P_compo with SN 6. Unscrap it (thanks to an internal transfer) 7. Repeat step 4 Error: a user error is raised: "The serial number SN used for component P_compo has already been consumed" When checking the SN uniqueness of a component, we don't consider the case where a product came back from a srap location OPW-3055252 closes odoo/odoo#105861 X-original-commit: ac11b7e0 Signed-off-by:
William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com> Signed-off-by:
Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
-
Adrien Widart (awt) authored
When marking a WO as done, if the serial number defined is related to an unbuilt product, an error will be raised and the user will not be able to mark the WO as done To reproduce the issue: 1. Create a BoM for product P with one operation - P is tracked by SN 2. Produce one P with serial S 3. Unbuild it 4. Create and confirm a second MO with 1 x P 5. Start the WO 6. On tablet view, set the finished lot to S 7. Mark the WO as done Error: a UserError is raised because "This serial number [...] has already been produced". However, this serial number has been unbuilt so the worker should be able to use it again When marking the WO as done, we check the uniqueness of the defined serial number. But: - The check is not accurate enough, hence the above error - The lot of the WO is a computed/inverse field based on lot of the MO - Once the WO closed, we can still change the lot of the MO - When marking the MO as done, a better method checks the SN uniqueness (does not fail in the above case) Therefore, the checking on WO side is useless. We should let the MO side handle this. Moreover, let's say that there is already one P in stock with serial S2. On tablet view, if the worker set the lot to S2, there should be a warning so he can be aware of the situation. This is already the case on MO side: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/45e37b2ad7bdcfd9f9f7e1dabbd0a99c9a0b5cdc/addons/mrp/models/mrp_production.py#L694-L705 (This commit is linked to a similar commit OE side, same opw) OPW-3002424 closes odoo/odoo#105860 X-original-commit: 402dfd0a Related: odoo/enterprise#33999 Signed-off-by:
Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com> Signed-off-by:
Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
-
Nicolas Bayet authored
Before this commit, once a user was disconnected from internet (eg. network failure, laptop screen closed), the code disconnected the user from the peer to peer network and upon reconnection to the internet network, the code did not try to reconnect to the peer to peer network. This created a network partion in the peer to peer network each time a user disconnected and reconnected to the internet network. When there is a partition in the peer to peer network, the last subnet to write to the record erased the changes of another subnet without notification. This commit prevent the code to disconnect from the peer to peer network when there is any disconnection signal triggered. closes odoo/odoo#105857 Signed-off-by:
David Monjoie (dmo) <dmo@odoo.com>
-
Cao Đình Trung authored
Steps to reproduce the error: - Install 'Maintenance' - Select 'Maintenance' -> 'Request Maintenance' - Create a maintenance request: + TH1: Save > Change stage to Repaired > 'Close date' = Date.Today() + TH2: Don't Save > Change stage to Repaired > Save > 'Close date' = blank closes odoo/odoo#105741 Problem: App will show 'Close Date' blank Expected: App will display 'Close Date' as Date.Today() Solution: When Click on Save button -> Automatically get current date as end date X-original-commit: badc4ace Signed-off-by:
Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
-
damr authored
In rating/controllers/main.py, the method action_submit_rating accepts only post request. This creates a problem when you're trying to use the web editor on the template as well as when you just paste the url in your browser, for those are get request. The current behavior is a crash with 'method not allowed'. This commit's purpose is to change the method so it also accept get request. The use case of editing the feedback rating page is arguable but it schould not crash. The behavior after this commit is that the web editor is enable for the page, and relaoding the page does not crash anymore. task-3047893 closes odoo/odoo#105868 X-original-commit: d8f3c941 Signed-off-by:
Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
-
Adrien Widart (awt) authored
A commit [1] has recently be added to fix an issue. It actually fixes another issue too: 1. Create a product P - Storable - With one packaging PK for 10 x P 2. Create and confirm a PO - Order Lines: - 10 x P with PK 3. On the PO, decrease the quantity of P to 8 Without [1], a return is created for the difference. With [1], the existing picking is correctly updated. This commit adds a test to protect the use case. [1] 20fa7c6f OPW-3027110 closes odoo/odoo#105430 Signed-off-by:
William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
-
Adrien Widart (awt) authored
When decreasing the qty of a SOL, if there is already a packaging defined, a return will be created for the difference To reproduce the issue: 1. Create a product P - Storable - With one packaging PK for 10 x P 2. Create and confirm a SO - Order Lines: - 10 x P with PK 3. On the SO, decrease the quantity of P to 8 Error: a return is created for the difference. Instead, the existing picking should be updated At some point, we try to merge the stock moves (`10 x P` and `-2 x P`) and, to do so, they must have the same `product_packaging_id`: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/08f53ffa30479cfb452ebaed61b42655eb0e6a95/addons/stock/models/stock_move.py#L808-L813 However, on the SO, when decreasing the quantity, an onchange tries to find the best packaging. Because the new quantity is not a multiple of PK, this one is not returned. As a result, the SO has no more packaging and so does the new stock move (`-2 x P`). Therefore, the stock moves can not be merged and a new picking (the return) is created. This commit updates the onchange method so it behaves the same way as purchase side: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/20fa7c6f0f5c9cdfae2519ea8d0ff849d7fa3b9e/addons/purchase/models/purchase.py#L1224-L1231 In this onchange, the same diff has recently be added for another reason (see [1]) [1] 20fa7c6f OPW-3027110 Part-of: odoo/odoo#105430
-
Nshimiyimana Séna authored
### Steps to reproduce * install the *VAT Number Validation `(base_vat)`* and Contacts module. * Create a new contact from San Marino and set their Tax Id to SM05426 * Save the contact You should see that the leading zeros have been removed on the Tax Id (here, SM05426 became SM5426) opw-3007722 closes odoo/odoo#105822 X-original-commit: 24207914 Signed-off-by:
Josse Colpaert <jco@odoo.com>
-
Adrien Widart (awt) authored
When returning a dropshipped and subcontracted product to the supplier location, the received quantity of the PO line will be incorrect To reproduce the issue: 1. Create two storable products P_compo, P_Finished 2. Create a BoM: - Product: P_finished - Type: Subcontracting - Subcontractors: a subcontractor S - Components: 1 x P_compo 3. Create and confirm a PO: - Vendor: S - Deliver To: Dropship - Drop Ship Address: a partner P - Products: 1 x P_finished 4. Validate the receipt 5. Create a return with 1 x P_finished: - Update SO/PO quantities: True - Return Location: Partner Locations/Vendors 6. Validate the return 7. Go back to the PO Error: The qty received is 2, it should be 0 There is currently no code to handle the return of a dropshipped product OPW-3030895 closes odoo/odoo#105793 X-original-commit: 8276a9b5 Signed-off-by:
William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com> Signed-off-by:
Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
-
Adrien Widart (awt) authored
When returning a dropshipped and subcontracted product to an internal location, the received quantity of the PO line will be incorrect To reproduce the issue: 1. In Settings, enable "Storage Locations" 2. Create two storable products P_compo, P_Finished 3. Create a BoM: - Product: P_finished - Type: Subcontracting - Subcontractors: a subcontractor S - Components: 1 x P_compo 4. In Locations, edit WH/Stock: - Return location: True 5. Create and confirm a PO: - Vendor: S - Deliver To: Dropship - Drop Ship Address: a partner P - Products: 1 x P_finished 6. Validate the receipt 7. Create a return with 1 x P_finished: - Update SO/PO quantities: True - Return Location: WH/Stock 8. Validate the return 9. Go back to the PO Error: The qty received is 2, it should be 1 (it should not be 0 since the product has been returned to an internal location) In `/purchase_stock._compute_qty_received`, there is already a code to anticipate such a situation (i.e., a user who returns a dropshipped product to his stock location): https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/bf3c398f0644f690c64815b2b6e298aed7bedd70/addons/purchase_stock/models/purchase.py#L300-L305 However, the methods `_is_dropshipped` and `_is_dropshipped_returned` do not include the feature subcontracting + dropshipping. This is the reason why, in `_compute_qty_received`, the above condition is not respected and why we add the return stock move to the received qty. OPW-3030895 X-original-commit: 0486e2e5 Part-of: odoo/odoo#105793
-
CarmenMiranda authored
Splitting the method `_get_order_lines` will allow making it inheritable, this way more order line fields can be added and expand them easily and avoid having to overwrite it. closes odoo/odoo#105599 Signed-off-by:
Trinh Jacky (trj) <trj@odoo.com>
-
- Nov 15, 2022
-
-
Ahmad Khanalizadeh authored
Before this commit: when `Limited Products Loading` is enabled in PoS settings, and `Load all remaining products in the background` is disabled, the search bar only uses `name` to look for products to fetch from database. This causes problem when for example the user is using barcodes to identify products. To fix this, the search domain should be expanded to include all of the fields which are normally used when searching for products. opw-3055960 closes odoo/odoo#105748 Signed-off-by:
Masereel Pierre <pim@odoo.com>
-
Solan Delvenne (sode) authored
Pingen does not support localized country names, as such we need to force English locale. closes odoo/odoo#105176 X-original-commit: 006dcbf8 Signed-off-by:
Florian Daloze (fda) <fda@odoo.com>
-
Bruno Boi authored
Some missing aria attributes from 14.0 are reintroduced. They are required for screen reader users to be able to know if menus are opened and if menuitems are checked (e.g. if a filter is applied). closes odoo/odoo#105163 Signed-off-by:
Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com> Co-authored-by:
Luis González <lgonzalez@vauxoo.com>
-
Bruno Boi authored
Dropdown menus/items were refactored and moved to OWL when migrating to 15.0. Now, the focus is always on the dropdown button, which captures and handles all keyboard events, to be able to move over the menus. Currently-selected item is highlighted by toggling classes. However, since the focus is always on the dropdown button, screen reader users are no longer able to know what menu item is being selected, as it's only a visual change (in previous versions, the focus actually moved to the selected element). The above is fixed by making the activeElement follow the visual change. Part-of: odoo/odoo#105163 Co-authored-by:
Luis González <lgonzalez@vauxoo.com>
-
gawa-odoo authored
There are specific accounts that should be used for tax groups for each version of the CoA t-3059059 closes odoo/odoo#105736 X-original-commit: 453cf0b6 Signed-off-by:
John Laterre (jol) <jol@odoo.com> Signed-off-by:
Wala Gauthier (gawa) <gawa@odoo.com>
-
Nikhilkrishnan authored
closes odoo/odoo#86322 Signed-off-by:
Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
-
Aungkokolin1997 authored
closes odoo/odoo#103409 Signed-off-by:
Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
-
Thomas Lefebvre (thle) authored
Steps to reproduce: - install the "Extended Adresses" module; - in the configuration menu --> countries, edit the street format for Belgium to " %(street_name)s" (with whitespaces) - create a new contact; - select a contact suggested by the auto complete feature (for example Odoo) Issue: Some letters are removed if we add whitespaces in the street format (street_name field has the value "e du Laid Burniat 5" instead of "Rue du Laid Burniat 5"). Cause: The function which splits the raw address taking into account heading characters. Therefore the function truncates whatever is in front of the first field of the street format which is normally the image of the address (street_raw). Example 1: (correct use) street_raw = "header Rue du Laid Burniat 5" street_format = "header %(street_name)s" street_name = "Rue du Laid Burniat 5" --> OK (format address is properly configured to match with street_raw) Example 2: (incorrect use but desired behavior) street_raw = "Rue du Laid Burniat 5" street_format = "header %(street_name)s" street_name = "Laid Burniat 5" --> truncation is expected (7 leading characters are removed) (format address is not properly configured to match with street_raw) Example 3: (incorrect use and unwanted behavior) street_raw = "Rue du Laid Burniat 5" street_format = " %(street_name)s" street_name = "ue du Laid Burniat 5" --> truncation is not expected (1 leading character is removed) (format address is "properly" configured but with whitespace) Solution: Remove whitespaces before street format when editing this field to prevent truncation of the field value. opw-2964457 closes odoo/odoo#105568 X-original-commit: a6e8e0f6 Signed-off-by:
Quentin De Paoli <qdp@odoo.com> Signed-off-by:
Lefebvre Thomas (thle) <thle@odoo.com>
-
Solan Delvenne (sode) authored
Fixes a small but massive typo that prevents snailmail from working on version 14 to 15 closes odoo/odoo#105720 X-original-commit: dc3ed690 Signed-off-by:
Florian Daloze (fda) <fda@odoo.com> Signed-off-by:
Solan Delvenne (sode) <sode@odoo.com>
-
Javier Duran authored
closes odoo/odoo#103215 Signed-off-by:
Trinh Jacky (trj) <trj@odoo.com>
-
- Nov 14, 2022
-
-
maximilien(malb) authored
The account 81 to 89 were misclassified, this PR fix the issue closes odoo/odoo#104074 Signed-off-by:
Josse Colpaert <jco@odoo.com>
-
Audric Onockx (auon) authored
Steps : Go to project > settings. Check 'timesheet' config and save. Uncheck it back and save. Issue : See errors in the logs, due to on delete restrict. Cause : Record 'hr_timesheet.internal_project_default_stage' from data is deleted when hr_timesheet is uninstalled. Yet some project task records still use it, so we can't delete it. Fix : Delete the corresponding ir.model.data to keep the stage, but unlink it from the 'hr_timesheet.internal_project_default_stage' ref. task-2998416 closes odoo/odoo#101633 Related: odoo/enterprise#32022 Signed-off-by:
Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
-