Parallax elements are overflow:hidden so that their moving background
does not overflow. This introduces a limitation: no dropdown can
overflow the snippet either.

While a better solution should be found in master, this allows overflow
for the "fixed" parallax which does not use an overflowing background.

opw-2091324

closes odoo/odoo#41492

X-original-commit: 72d3b016
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>

Writing barcode on a template will only write it on the variants if the
variant count is 1. Make the field readonly on the view according to
this condition.

closes odoo/odoo#41489

X-original-commit: a67ad076
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>

The wording was "Use" but when you disable it the option, they don't
stop being used.

opw-2152288
closes #41487

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>

You can use has_group(employee) instead

+ fix enumerate_page: when you search a page with visibility constraints,
you never seen it even if force was set to True.

task-2091365 again

closes odoo/odoo#41483

X-original-commit: f1c7a34f0b8276895c18ca6c450a142f9a815e3b
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>

- Go to Contacts
- Search by 'Tag' with a non existing tag

A crash occurs.

This is because of an incorrect SQL:

`WHERE "category_id" IN ()`

In case of an empty list `ids2`, we fall back on `(None,)`

Note that it appears only in v13 because `child_of` was added at [1],
but the issue also exists in v12.

[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b6325ae45b830a725f6ab6706b70f65c809be4a7/odoo/addons/base/views/res_partner_views.xml#L471



opw-2151129

closes odoo/odoo#41479

X-original-commit: 6372fba2
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>

MAke sure to always set the expiration date of a coupon.

opw-2151284

closes odoo/odoo#41470

X-original-commit: 2e5a6699
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>

OPW 2151580
There is a needed font for the swiss IRS report: OCR-B. This commit
ensures it is used.

closes odoo/odoo#41466

X-original-commit: 8f4a390c
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>

This commit introduces a new snippet: Countdown.

The countdown snippet is composed of 4 circle countdown, one for every time
unit: seconds, minutes, hours and days.

When countdown ends, the user can chose between 3 possible actions:
1. Nothing
2. Show message: show a message once the countdown ends.
   The message will be displayed bellow the countdown (stopped on 0) or will
   replace the countdown depending on the option selected.
   The message can be edited through the website builder.
3. Redirect: redirect the user to the chosen URL. If the user is on the page at
   the exact moment the countdown reach 0, the user will be redirected
   automatically. If the user lands on the page after the countdown has reached
   0, there will be no redirection and the link will be shown bellow the
   countdown (stopped on 0) or will replace the countdown depending on the
   option selected.

The countdown layout can be customized in multiple ways:
1. By choosing to hide some time units. For instance, seconds can be hidden or
   only days shown.
2. By changing its size between small/medium/large.
3. By changing its basic design (circle, boxes, clean).
4. By changing its advanced design (shape, background, progress bar..)

task-2093081

closes odoo/odoo#39773

Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>

I removed a handler without removing the event binding by mistake...

closes odoo/odoo#41481

Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>

Before this commit, the website was given as a parameter of the
_post_copy function which is called after theme install. It was then
transfered through the context when calling the theme sub' post_copy
function.

It makes actually more sense to directly call the _post_copy function
with the right website in the context instead of a parameter. This will
also allow to call enable_view/disable_view in the default post_copy
common to all theme, with the right website.

closes odoo/odoo#41312

Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>

task-2151416

closes odoo/odoo#41473

Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>

Search bank account with company to handle the case where the res.partner.bank
is defined in several companies. Without this commit, a Value error was raised
because we expect only one record returned.

closes odoo/odoo#41469

X-original-commit: 9be0adb9
Signed-off-by: Alex Tuyls <alt-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>

Overwrite the method ``write`` of the model ``product.product``.

When we write on ``standard_price``, if
- the context key ``disable_auto_svl`` is not set
- the ``cost_method`` is not "fifo"
We automatically compute ``stock.valuation.layer``

(before we needed to manually call ``_change_standard_price``)

Task #2031422

closes odoo/odoo#41265

Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>

PURPOSE

Allow some questions to be linked to customer data. We would like to have an
email field filled with user info / updating user info automatically in the survey.

SPECIFICATION

For now, we only want to be able to collect the user email address for a specific
question of the survey. For that purpose, add a ``save_as_email`` field on the
question model.

If this option is checked, the answer to that specific question will override the
"email" stored on the survey.user_input allowing live udpate of user input
based on given information. If multiple questions are marked as such, the
last (not empty) answer will prevail.

If user input already has an email (invitation-based surveys for example)
prefill the answer with the email so that people don't have to retype it.

GOING FURTHER (aka, incoming)

With live mode: maybe some additional fields will need to be saved
nickname
avatar

LINKS

Task 1919290
PR #41429

Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Aurélien Warnon <awa@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>

Oversight of 374b57a1 .

From
"Their was an error during the validation of the survey."
To
"There was an error during the validation of the survey."

Some side code linting is also performed because my linter is screaming on
me.

Task ID 1919290
PR #41429

Co-Authored-By: Aurélien Warnon <awa@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>

Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/41402



closes odoo/odoo#41402

Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>

Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/41402

Before this commit, inputs were always a title followed by the <input/>
on the same line.

Now it follows the same logic as we-row elements: title on a line,
<input/> on a new line, except if the 'o_we_inline' class is used.

Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/41402

Especially useful with a no-preview input.

Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/41402

Add the ability for a snippet option's method to target multiple
subelements of the option's $target using the data-apply-to attribute
with a jQuery selector. This is achieved by calling the method on a
proxy of the object where accesses to the $target are redirected to a
different object.

While it may seem preferable to just set the $target before calling the
method and restoring it after the call, as this would be much simpler
code, it is not possible as this breaks down under asynchronous
conditions, hence the need to operate on a proxy such that all
concurrent asynchronous operations have their own independent $target
available for their entire time of execution.

Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/41402

Create a new contact (just open the create form)

The "Language" field is missing, because active_lang_count is not
computed before the record is saved, but it is necessary to display the
language field

opw-2149324

closes odoo/odoo#41172

X-original-commit: 4c90fde4
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>

* converts dynamic domain from onchange_department_or_employee_id to a
  static domain on the field
* remove the department_id field (and all uses of it), it looks to
  never be set and not really be settable: the field is hidden in the
  form, doesn't have a default value, does not have anything to
  compute it, ...
* remove the onchange itself as it has very little value: it
  auto-selects an equipment if there exists a single equipment
  assigned to the selected employee or to no employee

  Even if we removed the "equipment not assigned to any user"
  bit (under the assumption that people would mostly request
  maintenance for their own equipment, and that this would usefully
  trigger more often) it's unlikely for dedicated users of
  hr_maintenance to assign only one equipment per employee. So the
  onchange would rarely do any useful work, and what work it saves is
  trivial: if there's only one equipment the employee could ask about
  for maintenance it's really trivial to do that.

Task 2115472

closes odoo/odoo#40963

Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS

[REF] survey: remove unused or unnecessary fields to clean models. Some fields
are also renamed to better indicate their use.

  * On survey.survey, remove question field, unnecessary related on title.
  * On survey.survey, remove unused category field.
  * On survey.user_input, remove input_type and its garbage collect.
  * On survey.{survey, user_input}, remove url fields replaced by methods

  * On survey.survey, rename thanks_you_message to description_done
  * On survey.survey, rename certificate field to certification
  * On survey.survey, rename passing_score field to scoring_success_min
  * On survey.user_input, rename quiz_score field to scoring_percentage
  * On survey.user_input, rename quizz_passed field to scoring_success
  * On survey.user_input, rename token field to access_token
  * On survey.user_input, rename question_ids field to predefined_question_ids

[REF] survey: rename some models to ease understanding

In this merge we rename the long standing ``survey.label`` model. Indeed
a label is something before a question, like an input label. Labels in survey
are used for suggested answers and sometimes as rows for matrix answers.

After much thoughts we rename ``survey.label`` to ``survey.question.answer``.
It indicates this model holds answers. Moreover it is namespaced within the
``survey.question`` model name to avoid conflict with user input / user answer
model.

As model naming changes, some fields also evolve. In survey.question model

  * ``labels_id`` is renamed to ``suggested_answer_ids`` to indicate it is
    used to display suggested values to the user;
  * ``labels_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_row_ids`` to indicate it is used
    to generate the rows of the matrix-type question. A matrix is therefore
    done using ``matrix_row_ids`` for rows and ``suggested_answer_ids`` for
    columns which seems easier to understand;

In survey.question.answer (old survey.label) model

  * ``question_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_question_id`` to ease its
    understanding, notably that it is used for matrix questions;

Main user answer model is ``survey.user_input``. It holds lines related to
answers given to specific questions. In this commit we rename this model from
``survey.user_input_line`` to ``survey.user_input.line`` to be coherent with
general odoo naming guidelines.

[REF] survey: on survey.user_input.line, rename value_suggested{_row}

A new naming recently introduced for ``survey.question.answer`` has been
recently introduced: ``suggested_answer_ids`` and ``matrix_row_ids``. In
this commit we propagate that naming to survey.user_input.line model. New
naming is

  * ``suggested_answer_id``: one chosen value for single / multiple choice.
    It is also used for matrix columns as those indicates the value to give
    on a given row;
  * ``matrix_row_id``: the related row of the suggested answer for matrix
    questions;

It adds two benefits

  * it finishes by _id which is always a good idea for m2o fields;
  * it better indicate the use;

 [REF] survey: on survey.{question,user_input.line}, make type and field names match

To better understand question type and their input type, we update some of
``survey.question`` ``question_type`` keys :

  Type----Old type-----New type

  text----free_text----text_box
  char----textbox------char_box

Untouched question types: ``numerical_box``, ``date``, ``datetime``,
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice``, ``matrix``. Those are already
understandable.

Then ``survey.user_input.line`` ``answer_type`` keys are also updated to
match their question type counterparts

  QuestType--------Old type-----New type

  text_box---------free_text----text_box
  char_box---------text---------char_box
  numerical_box----number-------numerical_box

Then ``survey.user_input.line`` fields used to store the value are updated to
propagate the new naming

  AnswerLineType----Old field----------New field

  text_box----------value_free_text----value_text_box
  char_box----------value_text---------value_char_box
  numerical_box-----value_number-------value_numerical_box

Untouched answer types and field storing value: ``date``, ``datetime`` still
refer to same question type and use value_date / value_datetime fields.
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice`` and ``matrix`` still use ``suggestion``
answer type and ``suggested_answer_id`` (+ ``matrix_row_id``) to store link
to ``survey.question.answer`` records.

[REF] survey: refactor results page

Purpose of this merge is to globally rewrite the way statistics are
pre computed and used in results page of surveys. Indeed current code is
very complex, having a lot of calls to the same methods while taking only
part of its results. It also have a mix of model and controller methods,
data is computed several times a bit differently, ...

In this commit we rewrite that part. Including

  * a simpler code flow;
  * a simpler data structure;
  * use a better naming for methods instead of "prepare_results" called
    randomly within the code and re-using part of its returned content;
  * use record sets / records instead of giving sub-elements of a record
    like question.title, label.value, ...

Data structure

  * simply give a question_and_page_ids to the template that will iterate
    on pages / questions;
  * have a graph_data, table_data dictionaries available for graph and
    table display with simple entries;
  * graph_data: holding all necessary but minimalist data for graph display
    if question allows it;
  * table_data: holding all necessary but minimalist data for table / summary
    display;
  * hold record sets of done / failed answers and answer lines;

In this commit we also simplify and clean pagination in survey graph results

  * remove page_range helper tool that can be inlined in the templates
    directly, doing a simple range;
  * fix and improve pagination code;

[IMP] survey: improve demo data

Add a new demo survey about a quiz: a survey with scoring but no certificate.
Have almost all possible combinations of questions and options (notably choices
to have a scoring) and answer lines in order to be able to, notably, debug
the statistics / result page.

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

closes odoo/odoo#41198

Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS

Add a new demo survey about a quiz: a survey with scoring but no certificate.
Have almost all possible combinations of questions and options (notably choices
to have a scoring) and answer lines in order to be able to, notably, debug
the statistics / result page.

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS

Purpose of this commit is to globally rewrite the way statistics are
pre computed and used in results page of surveys. Indeed current code is
very complex, having a lot of calls to the same methods while taking only
part of its results. It also have a mix of model and controller methods,
data is computed several times a bit differently, ...

In this commit we rewrite that part. Including

  * a simpler code flow;
  * a simpler data structure;
  * use a better naming for methods instead of "prepare_results" called
    randomly within the code and re-using part of its returned content;
  * use record sets / records instead of giving sub-elements of a record
    like question.title, label.value, ...

Data structure

  * simply give a question_and_page_ids to the template that will iterate
    on pages / questions;
  * have a graph_data, table_data dictionaries available for graph and
    table display with simple entries;
  * graph_data: holding all necessary but minimalist data for graph display
    if question allows it;
  * table_data: holding all necessary but minimalist data for table / summary
    display;
  * hold record sets of done / failed answers and answer lines;

In this commit we also simplify and clean pagination in survey graph results

  * remove page_range helper tool that can be inlined in the templates
    directly, doing a simple range;
  * fix and improve pagination code;

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS

This commit lints JS files located in survey as some typos and mistakes
were recently introduced. Code related to routes is also slightly reorganized
to better understand file main sections.

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS

In survey.user_input.line, clean code about constraints. Purpose is to make
it easier to read and understand.

Code creating user input lines is moved from survey.user_input.line model to
survey.user_input. Indeed it is now based on a user_input record, and create
answer line related to a question, based on values coming from controllers
(and therefore frontend). It makes more sense to delegate that code to the
user_input model itself that creates its lines. Code is also rewritten to
be cleaner and easier to read.

Code computing statistics on user input records is moved from survey model
to user_input model, where it belongs. Missing translation marks are added
because translations matter.

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS

To better understand question type and their input type, we update some of
``survey.question`` ``question_type`` keys :

  Type----Old type-----New type

  text----free_text----text_box
  char----textbox------char_box

Untouched question types: ``numerical_box``, ``date``, ``datetime``,
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice``, ``matrix``. Those are already
understandable.

Then ``survey.user_input.line`` ``answer_type`` keys are also updated to
match their question type counterparts

  QuestType--------Old type-----New type

  text_box---------free_text----text_box
  char_box---------text---------char_box
  numerical_box----number-------numerical_box

Then ``survey.user_input.line`` fields used to store the value are updated to
propagate the new naming

  AnswerLineType----Old field----------New field

  text_box----------value_free_text----value_text_box
  char_box----------value_text---------value_char_box
  numerical_box-----value_number-------value_numerical_box

Untouched answer types and field storing value: ``date``, ``datetime`` still
refer to same question type and use value_date / value_datetime fields.
``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice`` and ``matrix`` still use ``suggestion``
answer type and ``suggested_answer_id`` (+ ``matrix_row_id``) to store link
to ``survey.question.answer`` records.

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS

``question_ids`` field name is quite difficult to understand as we wonder why
there is such a field on user input model. As its purpose is to store questions
user has to answer (randomly chosen or all chosen) let us rename it to
``predefined_question_ids``.

Moreover starting from now on if it is now given at create it is automatically
computed. Classic flows go through ``survey._create_answer()`` method that
prepares them accordingly. However tests or demo data do not necessarily go
through that method and it makes scoring fail (notably) if people forget
to define them.

Let us automatically generate them at user input create if not given.

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS

A new naming for ``survey.question.answer`` has been recently introduced:
``suggested_answer_ids`` and ``matrix_row_ids``. In this commit we propagate
that naming to survey.user_input.line model. New naming is

  * ``suggested_answer_id``: one chosen value for single / multiple choice.
    It is also used for matrix columns as those indicates the value to give
    on a given row;
  * ``matrix_row_id``: the related row of the suggested answer for matrix
    questions;

It adds two benefits

  * it finishes by _id which is always a good idea for m2o fields;
  * it better indicates the use;

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME QUIZ_SCORE ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT

On survey.user_input, quiz_score field to scoring_percentage

``quiz_score`` field name is related to the old "quiz" behavior of surveys
that is replaced by certifications and scoring mechanisms. Let us propagate
the renaming, beginning with a ``scoring_`` prefix.

SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME QUIZZ_PASSED ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT

on survey.user_input, rename quizz_passed field to scoring_success

``quizz_passed`` field name is related to the old "quiz" behavior of surveys
that is replaced by certifications and scoring mechanisms. Let us propagate
the renaming, beginning with a ``scoring_`` prefix.

SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME TOKEN ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT

on survey.user_input, rename token field to access_token

Survey user input model holds two token field. One is used to distinguish
a pool of attempts linked to a given invite: ``invite_token``. The other
one is used to control access to a specific user input. It means that
``invite_token`` indicates a set of user inputs and each of them is accessed
through its own ``token``. To be coherent with other naming in odoo this
latter field is renamed to ``access_token``.

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME THANKS_YOU_MESSAGE ON SURVEY.SURVEY

On survey.survey, rename thanks_you_message to description_done

In this commit we rename thanks_you_message field. Indeed for certifications
or recruitment form, "thank you" is not really the unique content you
would get in a post-survey message. We therefore rename it to description_done
to better indicate its use.

SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME CERTIFICATE ON SURVEY.SURVEY

On survey.survey, rename certificate field to certification

All certification related fields on survey model begin with certification_ .
Only the boolean one telling if a survey is a certification or not is called
certificate. In order to ease grep and ordering it is renamed to certification.

SPECIFICATIONS: RENAME PASSING_SCORE ON SURVEY.SURVEY

on survey.survey, rename passing_score field to scoring_success_min

``passing_score`` field name is not really the best name we could find.
Renaming the field using a ``scoring_`` prefix allow to know this field
is linked to the scoring mechanism.

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS

Main user answer model is ``survey.user_input``. It holds lines related to
answers given to specific questions. In this commit we rename this model from
``survey.user_input_line`` to ``survey.user_input.line`` to be coherent with
general odoo naming guidelines.

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS

In this commit we rename the long standing ``survey.label`` model. Indeed
a label is something before a question, like an input label. Labels in survey
are used for suggested answers and sometimes as rows for matrix answers.

After much thoughts we rename ``survey.label`` to ``survey.question.answer``.
It indicates this model holds answers. Moreover it is namespaced within the
``survey.question`` model name to avoid conflict with user input / user answer
model.

As model naming changes, some fields also evolve. In survey.question model

  * ``labels_id`` is renamed to ``suggested_answer_ids`` to indicate it is
    used to display suggested values to the user;
  * ``labels_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_row_ids`` to indicate it is used
    to generate the rows of the matrix-type question. A matrix is therefore
    done using ``matrix_row_ids`` for rows and ``suggested_answer_ids`` for
    columns which seems easier to understand;

In survey.question.answer (old survey.label) model

  * ``question_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_question_id`` to ease its
    understanding, notably that it is used for matrix questions;

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS: QUESTION FIELD ON SURVEY.SURVEY

On survey.survey, remove question field, unnecessary related on title.

Question model holds two fields for its title: ``title`` and ``question``.
Question is simply a related on title, making the two fields completely
redundant. It is mainly due to historical reasons, when updating models for
certifications and eLearning. In this commit we keep only title field and
remove the question related field as it adds unnecessary complexity to the
model.

SPECIFICATIONS: INPUT_TYPE FIELD ON SURVEY.USER_INPUT

On survey.user_input, remove input_type and its garbage collect.

``input_type`` field exists on user input model to tell whether answer has
been created through invite or through manual click on a survey page. It
has been added a long time ago when surveys were either open to everyone,
either closed and on invite only.

Since eLearning and certification surveys access mode on surveys has evolved.
Notably being able to distinguish invite from manual survey user input is not
necessary anymore. Indeed what is important is the way people can reach the
survey, not how they created their user input.

Invitation creates token and this can be used if people effectively want to
find invitation-related user inputs.

Since 09ea5c7d manual entries still in draft are garbage collected.
Reason is still unclear as it is not obvious that tons of unnecessary entries
will be created. As this seems like unnecessary optimization this commit
removes that feature along with the input_type field.

SPECIFICATIONS: REPLACE URLS FIELDS BY METHODS ON SURVEY.{SURVEY, USER_INPUT}

On survey.{survey, user_input}, remove url fields replaced by methods

In this commit we remove some remaining of URL fields that are better found
using methods. Both survey and user input holds a "start" url field that is
replaced by a method call ``get_start_url`` on both survey (generic) and
user input (token specific) models. We also introduced a ``get_print_url``
method doing the same for the printable version of survey / user input.

SPECIFICATIONS: REMOVE CATEGORY FIELD ON SURVEY.SURVEY

On survey.survey, remove unused category field.

Survey model holds a ``category`` field whose purpose is to be able to somehow
categorize surveys according to their use. However using this field is not
easy as it is hidden and is a simple selection field. Module should add their
own key. Its sole use is in ``hr_recruitment_survey`` which is a niche module.
Let us clean models and lessen model complexity.

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

PURPOSE

As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1]
and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this
PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code
and finally renaming models.

SPECIFICATIONS

Add math floor and ceil functions in qweb rendering context. It allows to use
some math methods directly in templates to avoid unnecessary data preparation
in controllers that lead to a lot of hard to read code mixed with important
code. Notably in survey we will use them for some pagination within statistics
rendering.

LINKS

[0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation)
[1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions)
[2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys)

PR #40765

Open Bank reconciliation, deactivate some record (-), go to "Manual
Operations" tab, add Analytic Tags using the "Search More" functionality.
Resulting tag will be blank and impossible to delete.

This is because:
1) The field shown is the display name, which is missing.
2) When selecting analytic tag(s) this way an array of
results is returned but it is not handled correclty by the view.
When selecting the analytic tag from the drop down menu a single value
'{id: , display_name: }' is returned.

opw-2146833

closes odoo/odoo#41419

X-original-commit: 42ae9ce544605314d969ae1210245f5b5bbf2628
Related: odoo/enterprise#7073
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>

closes odoo/odoo#41142

X-original-commit: fdbabfdc
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>

This commit adds mixin to manage file uploads in view controllers and to
display progress bars.

The first motivation and use case is to allow MRP to manage and display
uploads like in Documents.

closes odoo/odoo#38397

Task: #2074822
Related: odoo/enterprise#5887
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>