- Dec 09, 2019
-
-
Kevin Baptiste authored
This reverts commit ff1c3551. closes odoo/odoo#41480 X-original-commit: 116057b26e71db4692280463669f3e80d813ddcc Related: odoo/enterprise#7110 Signed-off-by:
Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
-
Yenthe666 authored
This will improve the extendibility of view inheritance closes odoo/odoo#41398 Signed-off-by:
Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
-
- Dec 03, 2019
-
-
jbm-odoo authored
Before this commit: If you have not at least the timesheet user right, you can't open project task as a field in not present in the view. After this commit: You can open the task view closes odoo/odoo#41229 Taskid: 2148606 Related: odoo/enterprise#6984 Signed-off-by:
Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
-
- Nov 28, 2019
-
-
Vishnu Thuletiya authored
Purpose of the task is, clicking on rating from publicly rating project dashboard it will produce the traceback. so fix the traceback by fixing typo in portal rating. Task-2145507 closes odoo/odoo#41132 Closes: #41005 X-original-commit: 9587ccc7 Signed-off-by:
Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
-
- Nov 26, 2019
-
-
fja-odoo authored
Add a domain that limits to the answers belonging an event only on the attendee form. Make the width of the event_type_mail_ids 100% Sort event.registrations by id DESC and Kanban view by name task-2071337 closes odoo/odoo#37256 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
- Dec 02, 2019
-
-
Katherine Zaoral authored
When creating vendor bills, it was considering this two numbers as different but actually are the same invoice number * 01234-00000001 + 1234-00000001 To avoid this we remove the zero to the left always if the pos number > 4. closes odoo/odoo#41436 X-original-commit: 15543ebb Signed-off-by:
Josse Colpaert <jco@openerp.com>
-
- Dec 08, 2019
-
-
Romain Derie authored
* website, website_mass_mailing We only have one invisible snippet (newsletter popup) which is handled by adding a yellow alert in the DOM in edit mode to be able to click somewhere to open the snippet options. As we will add some new invisible snippet (generic popup, cookies bar, and probably more) this needed to be improved. Now, any snippet having the `o_snippet_invisible` class will have an entry in the left panel in a dedicated zone to edit itself. This also allows to get rid of the yellow alert, making sure that "what you see is what you get" in the editor zone. task-2150966 closes odoo/odoo#41420 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
- Dec 06, 2019
-
-
fja-odoo authored
Introducing a new snippet called Chart. This snippet uses the lib https://www.chartjs.org/ 6 types of graph are possible: Bar vertical Bar horizontal Line Pie Doughnut Radar task-2092267 closes odoo/odoo#40051 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
Simon Lejeune authored
followup of rev [0] If these wizards are called on multiple pickings, display the list of the pickings that could be impacted and allow to select which one should be impacted. We also adapt the sanity checks at the start of `button_validte` in order to specify the concerned pickings if needed. We do not enable the multi behavior for batch at the moment, so it's only enabled for the validate multi in the list view. [0] 6ab4b0d4 task-2069646 closes odoo/odoo#41497 X-original-commit: ff276c6484b138982f185ec9c832f2dbf25baaef Signed-off-by:
Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
-
qsm-odoo authored
Parallax elements are overflow:hidden so that their moving background does not overflow. This introduces a limitation: no dropdown can overflow the snippet either. While a better solution should be found in master, this allows overflow for the "fixed" parallax which does not use an overflowing background. opw-2091324 closes odoo/odoo#41492 X-original-commit: 72d3b016 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
Simon Lejeune authored
Writing barcode on a template will only write it on the variants if the variant count is 1. Make the field readonly on the view according to this condition. closes odoo/odoo#41489 X-original-commit: a67ad076 Signed-off-by:
Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
-
Nicolas Lempereur authored
The wording was "Use" but when you disable it the option, they don't stop being used. opw-2152288 closes #41487 Signed-off-by:
Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
-
Jeremy Kersten authored
You can use has_group(employee) instead + fix enumerate_page: when you search a page with visibility constraints, you never seen it even if force was set to True. task-2091365 again closes odoo/odoo#41483 X-original-commit: f1c7a34f0b8276895c18ca6c450a142f9a815e3b Signed-off-by:
Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
-
Nicolas Martinelli authored
- Go to Contacts - Search by 'Tag' with a non existing tag A crash occurs. This is because of an incorrect SQL: `WHERE "category_id" IN ()` In case of an empty list `ids2`, we fall back on `(None,)` Note that it appears only in v13 because `child_of` was added at [1], but the issue also exists in v12. [1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b6325ae45b830a725f6ab6706b70f65c809be4a7/odoo/addons/base/views/res_partner_views.xml#L471 opw-2151129 closes odoo/odoo#41479 X-original-commit: 6372fba2 Signed-off-by:
Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
-
Nicolas Martinelli authored
MAke sure to always set the expiration date of a coupon. opw-2151284 closes odoo/odoo#41470 X-original-commit: 2e5a6699 Signed-off-by:
Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
-
- Dec 05, 2019
-
-
wan authored
OPW 2151580 There is a needed font for the swiss IRS report: OCR-B. This commit ensures it is used. closes odoo/odoo#41466 X-original-commit: 8f4a390c Signed-off-by:
Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
-
- Dec 06, 2019
-
-
Romain Derie authored
This commit introduces a new snippet: Countdown. The countdown snippet is composed of 4 circle countdown, one for every time unit: seconds, minutes, hours and days. When countdown ends, the user can chose between 3 possible actions: 1. Nothing 2. Show message: show a message once the countdown ends. The message will be displayed bellow the countdown (stopped on 0) or will replace the countdown depending on the option selected. The message can be edited through the website builder. 3. Redirect: redirect the user to the chosen URL. If the user is on the page at the exact moment the countdown reach 0, the user will be redirected automatically. If the user lands on the page after the countdown has reached 0, there will be no redirection and the link will be shown bellow the countdown (stopped on 0) or will replace the countdown depending on the option selected. The countdown layout can be customized in multiple ways: 1. By choosing to hide some time units. For instance, seconds can be hidden or only days shown. 2. By changing its size between small/medium/large. 3. By changing its basic design (circle, boxes, clean). 4. By changing its advanced design (shape, background, progress bar..) task-2093081 closes odoo/odoo#39773 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
qsm-odoo authored
I removed a handler without removing the event binding by mistake... closes odoo/odoo#41481 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
- Dec 05, 2019
-
-
qsm-odoo authored
Before this commit, the website was given as a parameter of the _post_copy function which is called after theme install. It was then transfered through the context when calling the theme sub' post_copy function. It makes actually more sense to directly call the _post_copy function with the right website in the context instead of a parameter. This will also allow to call enable_view/disable_view in the default post_copy common to all theme, with the right website. closes odoo/odoo#41312 Signed-off-by:
Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
-
- Dec 06, 2019
-
-
Ravi Singh authored
task-2151416 closes odoo/odoo#41473 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
alt-odoo authored
Search bank account with company to handle the case where the res.partner.bank is defined in several companies. Without this commit, a Value error was raised because we expect only one record returned. closes odoo/odoo#41469 X-original-commit: 9be0adb9 Signed-off-by:
Alex Tuyls <alt-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
-
Debauche Stéphane authored
Overwrite the method ``write`` of the model ``product.product``. When we write on ``standard_price``, if - the context key ``disable_auto_svl`` is not set - the ``cost_method`` is not "fifo" We automatically compute ``stock.valuation.layer`` (before we needed to manually call ``_change_standard_price``) Task #2031422 closes odoo/odoo#41265 Signed-off-by:
Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
-
Aurélien Warnon authored
PURPOSE Allow some questions to be linked to customer data. We would like to have an email field filled with user info / updating user info automatically in the survey. SPECIFICATION For now, we only want to be able to collect the user email address for a specific question of the survey. For that purpose, add a ``save_as_email`` field on the question model. If this option is checked, the answer to that specific question will override the "email" stored on the survey.user_input allowing live udpate of user input based on given information. If multiple questions are marked as such, the last (not empty) answer will prevail. If user input already has an email (invitation-based surveys for example) prefill the answer with the email so that people don't have to retype it. GOING FURTHER (aka, incoming) With live mode: maybe some additional fields will need to be saved nickname avatar LINKS Task 1919290 PR #41429 Signed-off-by:
Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com> Co-authored-by:
Aurélien Warnon <awa@odoo.com> Co-authored-by:
Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
-
Thibault Delavallée authored
Oversight of 374b57a1 .
-
Aurélien Warnon authored
From "Their was an error during the validation of the survey." To "There was an error during the validation of the survey." Some side code linting is also performed because my linter is screaming on me. Task ID 1919290 PR #41429 Co-Authored-By:
Aurélien Warnon <awa@odoo.com> Co-Authored-By:
Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
-
qsm-odoo authored
Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/41402 closes odoo/odoo#41402 Signed-off-by:
Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
-
qsm-odoo authored
Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/41402
-
qsm-odoo authored
Before this commit, inputs were always a title followed by the <input/> on the same line. Now it follows the same logic as we-row elements: title on a line, <input/> on a new line, except if the 'o_we_inline' class is used. Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/41402
-
qsm-odoo authored
Especially useful with a no-preview input. Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/41402
-
Samuel Degueldre authored
Add the ability for a snippet option's method to target multiple subelements of the option's $target using the data-apply-to attribute with a jQuery selector. This is achieved by calling the method on a proxy of the object where accesses to the $target are redirected to a different object. While it may seem preferable to just set the $target before calling the method and restoring it after the call, as this would be much simpler code, it is not possible as this breaks down under asynchronous conditions, hence the need to operate on a proxy such that all concurrent asynchronous operations have their own independent $target available for their entire time of execution. Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/41402
-
- Dec 02, 2019
-
-
Andrea Grazioso (agr-odoo) authored
Create a new contact (just open the create form) The "Language" field is missing, because active_lang_count is not computed before the record is saved, but it is necessary to display the language field opw-2149324 closes odoo/odoo#41172 X-original-commit: 4c90fde4 Signed-off-by:
Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
-
- Dec 06, 2019
-
-
Xavier Morel authored
* converts dynamic domain from onchange_department_or_employee_id to a static domain on the field * remove the department_id field (and all uses of it), it looks to never be set and not really be settable: the field is hidden in the form, doesn't have a default value, does not have anything to compute it, ... * remove the onchange itself as it has very little value: it auto-selects an equipment if there exists a single equipment assigned to the selected employee or to no employee Even if we removed the "equipment not assigned to any user" bit (under the assumption that people would mostly request maintenance for their own equipment, and that this would usefully trigger more often) it's unlikely for dedicated users of hr_maintenance to assign only one equipment per employee. So the onchange would rarely do any useful work, and what work it saves is trivial: if there's only one equipment the employee could ask about for maintenance it's really trivial to do that. Task 2115472 closes odoo/odoo#40963 Signed-off-by:
Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
-
- Dec 05, 2019
-
-
Odoo's Mergebot authored
PURPOSE As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1] and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code and finally renaming models. SPECIFICATIONS [REF] survey: remove unused or unnecessary fields to clean models. Some fields are also renamed to better indicate their use. * On survey.survey, remove question field, unnecessary related on title. * On survey.survey, remove unused category field. * On survey.user_input, remove input_type and its garbage collect. * On survey.{survey, user_input}, remove url fields replaced by methods * On survey.survey, rename thanks_you_message to description_done * On survey.survey, rename certificate field to certification * On survey.survey, rename passing_score field to scoring_success_min * On survey.user_input, rename quiz_score field to scoring_percentage * On survey.user_input, rename quizz_passed field to scoring_success * On survey.user_input, rename token field to access_token * On survey.user_input, rename question_ids field to predefined_question_ids [REF] survey: rename some models to ease understanding In this merge we rename the long standing ``survey.label`` model. Indeed a label is something before a question, like an input label. Labels in survey are used for suggested answers and sometimes as rows for matrix answers. After much thoughts we rename ``survey.label`` to ``survey.question.answer``. It indicates this model holds answers. Moreover it is namespaced within the ``survey.question`` model name to avoid conflict with user input / user answer model. As model naming changes, some fields also evolve. In survey.question model * ``labels_id`` is renamed to ``suggested_answer_ids`` to indicate it is used to display suggested values to the user; * ``labels_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_row_ids`` to indicate it is used to generate the rows of the matrix-type question. A matrix is therefore done using ``matrix_row_ids`` for rows and ``suggested_answer_ids`` for columns which seems easier to understand; In survey.question.answer (old survey.label) model * ``question_id_2`` is renamed to ``matrix_question_id`` to ease its understanding, notably that it is used for matrix questions; Main user answer model is ``survey.user_input``. It holds lines related to answers given to specific questions. In this commit we rename this model from ``survey.user_input_line`` to ``survey.user_input.line`` to be coherent with general odoo naming guidelines. [REF] survey: on survey.user_input.line, rename value_suggested{_row} A new naming recently introduced for ``survey.question.answer`` has been recently introduced: ``suggested_answer_ids`` and ``matrix_row_ids``. In this commit we propagate that naming to survey.user_input.line model. New naming is * ``suggested_answer_id``: one chosen value for single / multiple choice. It is also used for matrix columns as those indicates the value to give on a given row; * ``matrix_row_id``: the related row of the suggested answer for matrix questions; It adds two benefits * it finishes by _id which is always a good idea for m2o fields; * it better indicate the use; [REF] survey: on survey.{question,user_input.line}, make type and field names match To better understand question type and their input type, we update some of ``survey.question`` ``question_type`` keys : Type----Old type-----New type text----free_text----text_box char----textbox------char_box Untouched question types: ``numerical_box``, ``date``, ``datetime``, ``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice``, ``matrix``. Those are already understandable. Then ``survey.user_input.line`` ``answer_type`` keys are also updated to match their question type counterparts QuestType--------Old type-----New type text_box---------free_text----text_box char_box---------text---------char_box numerical_box----number-------numerical_box Then ``survey.user_input.line`` fields used to store the value are updated to propagate the new naming AnswerLineType----Old field----------New field text_box----------value_free_text----value_text_box char_box----------value_text---------value_char_box numerical_box-----value_number-------value_numerical_box Untouched answer types and field storing value: ``date``, ``datetime`` still refer to same question type and use value_date / value_datetime fields. ``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice`` and ``matrix`` still use ``suggestion`` answer type and ``suggested_answer_id`` (+ ``matrix_row_id``) to store link to ``survey.question.answer`` records. [REF] survey: refactor results page Purpose of this merge is to globally rewrite the way statistics are pre computed and used in results page of surveys. Indeed current code is very complex, having a lot of calls to the same methods while taking only part of its results. It also have a mix of model and controller methods, data is computed several times a bit differently, ... In this commit we rewrite that part. Including * a simpler code flow; * a simpler data structure; * use a better naming for methods instead of "prepare_results" called randomly within the code and re-using part of its returned content; * use record sets / records instead of giving sub-elements of a record like question.title, label.value, ... Data structure * simply give a question_and_page_ids to the template that will iterate on pages / questions; * have a graph_data, table_data dictionaries available for graph and table display with simple entries; * graph_data: holding all necessary but minimalist data for graph display if question allows it; * table_data: holding all necessary but minimalist data for table / summary display; * hold record sets of done / failed answers and answer lines; In this commit we also simplify and clean pagination in survey graph results * remove page_range helper tool that can be inlined in the templates directly, doing a simple range; * fix and improve pagination code; [IMP] survey: improve demo data Add a new demo survey about a quiz: a survey with scoring but no certificate. Have almost all possible combinations of questions and options (notably choices to have a scoring) and answer lines in order to be able to, notably, debug the statistics / result page. LINKS [0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation) [1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions) [2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys) PR #40765 closes odoo/odoo#41198 Signed-off-by:
Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
-
Thibault Delavallée authored
PURPOSE As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1] and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code and finally renaming models. SPECIFICATIONS Add a new demo survey about a quiz: a survey with scoring but no certificate. Have almost all possible combinations of questions and options (notably choices to have a scoring) and answer lines in order to be able to, notably, debug the statistics / result page. LINKS [0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation) [1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions) [2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys) PR #40765
-
Thibault Delavallée authored
PURPOSE As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1] and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code and finally renaming models. SPECIFICATIONS Purpose of this commit is to globally rewrite the way statistics are pre computed and used in results page of surveys. Indeed current code is very complex, having a lot of calls to the same methods while taking only part of its results. It also have a mix of model and controller methods, data is computed several times a bit differently, ... In this commit we rewrite that part. Including * a simpler code flow; * a simpler data structure; * use a better naming for methods instead of "prepare_results" called randomly within the code and re-using part of its returned content; * use record sets / records instead of giving sub-elements of a record like question.title, label.value, ... Data structure * simply give a question_and_page_ids to the template that will iterate on pages / questions; * have a graph_data, table_data dictionaries available for graph and table display with simple entries; * graph_data: holding all necessary but minimalist data for graph display if question allows it; * table_data: holding all necessary but minimalist data for table / summary display; * hold record sets of done / failed answers and answer lines; In this commit we also simplify and clean pagination in survey graph results * remove page_range helper tool that can be inlined in the templates directly, doing a simple range; * fix and improve pagination code; LINKS [0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation) [1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions) [2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys) PR #40765
-
Thibault Delavallée authored
PURPOSE As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1] and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code and finally renaming models. SPECIFICATIONS This commit lints JS files located in survey as some typos and mistakes were recently introduced. Code related to routes is also slightly reorganized to better understand file main sections. LINKS [0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation) [1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions) [2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys) PR #40765
-
Thibault Delavallée authored
PURPOSE As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1] and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code and finally renaming models. SPECIFICATIONS In survey.user_input.line, clean code about constraints. Purpose is to make it easier to read and understand. Code creating user input lines is moved from survey.user_input.line model to survey.user_input. Indeed it is now based on a user_input record, and create answer line related to a question, based on values coming from controllers (and therefore frontend). It makes more sense to delegate that code to the user_input model itself that creates its lines. Code is also rewritten to be cleaner and easier to read. Code computing statistics on user input records is moved from survey model to user_input model, where it belongs. Missing translation marks are added because translations matter. LINKS [0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation) [1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions) [2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys) PR #40765
-
Thibault Delavallée authored
PURPOSE As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1] and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code and finally renaming models. SPECIFICATIONS To better understand question type and their input type, we update some of ``survey.question`` ``question_type`` keys : Type----Old type-----New type text----free_text----text_box char----textbox------char_box Untouched question types: ``numerical_box``, ``date``, ``datetime``, ``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice``, ``matrix``. Those are already understandable. Then ``survey.user_input.line`` ``answer_type`` keys are also updated to match their question type counterparts QuestType--------Old type-----New type text_box---------free_text----text_box char_box---------text---------char_box numerical_box----number-------numerical_box Then ``survey.user_input.line`` fields used to store the value are updated to propagate the new naming AnswerLineType----Old field----------New field text_box----------value_free_text----value_text_box char_box----------value_text---------value_char_box numerical_box-----value_number-------value_numerical_box Untouched answer types and field storing value: ``date``, ``datetime`` still refer to same question type and use value_date / value_datetime fields. ``simple_choice``, ``multiple_choice`` and ``matrix`` still use ``suggestion`` answer type and ``suggested_answer_id`` (+ ``matrix_row_id``) to store link to ``survey.question.answer`` records. LINKS [0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation) [1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions) [2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys) PR #40765
-
Thibault Delavallée authored
PURPOSE As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1] and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code and finally renaming models. SPECIFICATIONS ``question_ids`` field name is quite difficult to understand as we wonder why there is such a field on user input model. As its purpose is to store questions user has to answer (randomly chosen or all chosen) let us rename it to ``predefined_question_ids``. Moreover starting from now on if it is now given at create it is automatically computed. Classic flows go through ``survey._create_answer()`` method that prepares them accordingly. However tests or demo data do not necessarily go through that method and it makes scoring fail (notably) if people forget to define them. Let us automatically generate them at user input create if not given. LINKS [0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation) [1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions) [2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys) PR #40765
-
Thibault Delavallée authored
PURPOSE As new features are about to land in survey, notably live interactions [1] and new survey building [2] performing a pre cleaning is necessary. In this PR we clean survey models by: removing unnecessary fields, cleaning some code and finally renaming models. SPECIFICATIONS A new naming for ``survey.question.answer`` has been recently introduced: ``suggested_answer_ids`` and ``matrix_row_ids``. In this commit we propagate that naming to survey.user_input.line model. New naming is * ``suggested_answer_id``: one chosen value for single / multiple choice. It is also used for matrix columns as those indicates the value to give on a given row; * ``matrix_row_id``: the related row of the suggested answer for matrix questions; It adds two benefits * it finishes by _id which is always a good idea for m2o fields; * it better indicates the use; LINKS [0] Related to Task ID 2061901 (survey models cleaning and preparation) [1] Task ID 1972640 (live interactions) [2] Task ID 2119587 (new frontend for building surveys) PR #40765
-